Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Stephen Young, consultant solicitor at Keystone Law, explains why Carillion entered compulsory liquidation rather than being placed in administration, and considers the wider implications of its collapse.
Why did Carillion enter compulsory liquidation rather than administration?
For an administrator to be appointed over a company, the proposed appointee must be satisfied that if appointed, they will be able to achieve one of the three statutory purposes:
Entering administration does not automatically shut down the company, as the process does give the appointee the ability to trade the business in order to see if all or part of it can be rescued.
By comparison, when a company enters compulsory liquidation, it immediately ceases to trade because normally there is no viable business left to save. Instead the liquidator will go in and realise any remaining assets of the company and distribute them to creditors.
Normally it takes several weeks between petitioning the court to wind up a company and an order being made, as actions must be taken within certain time limits.
Therefore, the fact that Carillion did not appoint administrators, but instead persuaded a judge to waive the statutory time limits and make a winding-up order during an out-of-hours telephone hearing on a Monday morning, demonstrates how desperate the position with Carillion must have been. The company obviously had no viable business to save, and I suspect that many of the contracts it had been awarded in recent years had margins so tight that no other business would be prepared to take them on. This meant that those advising the company immediately prior to the liquidation must have decided that none of the statutory administration purposes could be achieved.
There is also the issue of a report
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234