Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
James Dawson, barrister at 3PB, considers the decision in Re C. & M.B. Holdings Ltd, where trustees in bankruptcy sought relief in relation to a company in which the bankrupt owned shares.
Re C. & M.B. Holdings Ltd; Hamilton and another (Joint Trustees in Bankruptcy of Charles Newell Brown) v Brown and another company  EWHC 191 (Ch),  All ER (D) 103 (Feb)
The Companies Court ruled that the trustees in the bankruptcy of the first respondent’s husband were entitled to present a petition to wind up a company in which he had shares because they were to be regarded as ‘a member’ of the company, for the purposes of section 74 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) and, therefore, as registered within the company’s register of members for the relevant period. On the balance of probability, the trustees had established unfair prejudice and grounds for winding up the company, subject to financial issues yet to be determined.
Mr and Mrs Brown were equal shareholders in C. & MB. Holdings Ltd (C. & M.B.), and until Mr Brown was made bankrupt, joint directors but, as the court found, it was Mr Brown who was the experienced businessman and who ran C. & M.B. and its subsidiaries. Mr Brown was made bankrupt in May 2014, but continued to be concerned with C. & M.B.’s management after he was made bankrupt, in breach of section 11 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986.
Mr Brown’s joint trustees in bankruptcy (trustees) petitioned the court, claiming relief under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) and to have the company wound up on the ground that it was just and equitable to do so pursuant to IA 1986, s 122(1)(g). They relied on the fact that Mr Brown had continued to be involved in
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Stephen qualified as a solicitor in 2005 and joined the Restructuring and Insolvency team at Lexis®PSL in September 2014 from Shoosmiths LLP, where he was a senior associate in the restructuring and insolvency team.
Primarily focused on contentious and advisory corporate and personal insolvency work, Stephen’s experience includes acting for office-holders on a wide range of issues, including appointments, investigations and the recovery and realisation of assets (including antecedent transaction claims), and for creditors in respect of the impact on them of the insolvency of debtors and counterparties.
0330 161 1234