Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: Ian Defty, a director in the niche London insolvency firm of DDJ Insolvency Limited, discusses the likely implications of the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Bill for licensed insolvency practitioners.
What does the Bill seek to cover for insolvency professionals?
It is a sad fact that there is always a desire by the government to tinker with the insolvency profession. Recently that tinkering has led to the new Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Bill. In my view, the insolvency industry manages very well with the legislation that it is presented with, but unfortunately the government constantly feels it has to amend its own legislation at a whim.
The current Bill snuck in a number of new ideas, not limited to:
The majority of these matters were included in the Bill without any reference to stakeholders, in particular the insolvency industry.
The Bill does cover changes in the company directors' disqualification regime, and although comments were sought by government, they have been largely ignored.
I understand that the government accepts that 'the devil is in the detail' but it is not sufficient to say that when there are so many unknowns.
Does this meet the concerns of the majority of the respondents to the Trust and Transparency paper in your view?
The Trust and Transparency paper sought to provide just that for users. It is difficult to see how, for example, removing the ability of creditors to seek the appointment of their chosen officeholder can provide 'trust' to the creditor industries, yet alone those creditors who are individuals or small concerns.
If not, what more do you think still needs to be done by the government to meet these concerns?
Between the insolvency industry and the courts it is fair to say that insolvency is working very well. The small tinkering brought in by this Bill will not make any changes for the better. The profession needs to be working more with its creditors, not seeking to disenfranchise them.
In reality, how likely do you think it is that the Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills will claim compensation from disqualified directors in the future
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234