Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
Find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice with Lexis PSL
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Simon Passfield of Guildhall Chambers discusses the case of Walker and another v National Westminster Bank plc which raised the question of whether administrators had a proprietary interest in redress monies which survived a company dissolution.
Walker and another v National Westminster Bank plc and another  EWHC 315 (Ch),  All ER (D) 268 (Feb)
The Chancery Division dismissed an application by the claimants, who were the former administrators of a holiday park, for an order that the unpaid balance of their remuneration should be charged on and payable out as a sum of £62,646.06. The court held that the payment in issue was not an asset, and could not be subject to the charge as sought.
In 2008, the claimants were appointed as administrators of Sunnyside Holiday Park Limited (the company) by Lancashire Mortgage Corporation (LMC). Their appointment was renewed several times, but eventually expired in 2012, at which time LMC appointed fixed-charge receivers in their place. At the time they ceased to hold office, the claimants had recorded time costs of £164,664. LMC agreed to make a payment towards those costs from the sale proceeds of the company’s property, which reduced the claimant’s unpaid recorded time costs to approximately £132,000.
After the company was dissolved, the claimants were notified by Natwest that it had carried out a review of two interest rate swaps sold to the company in 2003 and had made a ‘provisional determination of redress’ in the sum of £62,646.06. Natwest indicated that if the company was restored to the register it would make a formal offer of redress in that amount.
The administrators asserted that they were entitled to the benefit of any redress monies by reason of paragraph 99(3) of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986, which provides that a former administrator’s remuneration and expenses shall be:
They sought an order directing Natwest to pay the monies directly to them.
The principal issue for determination was whether the monies claimed by the administrators constituted an asset which was potentially subject to a statutory charge. The judge also considered whether the former administrators would be able to accept any offer of redress.
The former administrators argued that the right to the redress payment was either a chose in
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234