Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Tax analysis: Why is the Premier Foods case so important for the future of VAT recovery in insolvency situations? Timothy Jarvis, partner at Squire Patton Boggs, explores the details of this case and argues that the result is potentially exciting news for customers in insolvency situations who have been incorrectly charged VAT.
R (on the application of Premier Foods (Holdings) Ltd) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners,  EWHC 1483 (Admin),  All ER (D) 205 (May)
The claimant erroneously paid approximately £4m VAT to the interested party (QCL), which it paid to the defendant Revenue and Customs Commissioners. The claimant contended that HMRC should refuse to repay QCL, which subsequently went into administration, unless it undertook to reimburse it in full, but HMRC refused and the claimant sought judicial review. The Administrative Court, in allowing the application, held that Reemtsma Cigarettenfabriken GmbH v Finance Minister: C-35/05  All ER (D) 266 (Mar) applied, such that the claimant was entitled to recover the mistakenly paid VAT directly from HMRC.
What is interesting about the litigation brought by Premier?
The litigation brought by Premier relates to VAT that was incorrectly charged to it by a supplier. Normally when a customer, such as Premier, is incorrectly charged VAT by its supplier the customer's remedy is a common law restitution claim against the supplier--with the supplier having a statutory right of recovery against the taxation authority in respect of the VAT. However, in Reemtsma Cigarettenfabriken GmbH v Finance Minister the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) acknowledged that this principle did not apply in all circumstances and in some circumstances the customer could have recourse directly to the taxation authority. The CJEU held:
'If reimbursement of the VAT becomes impossible or excessively difficult, in particular in the case of the insolvency of the supplier, these principles may require that the recipient of the services
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234