Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
IP & IT analysis: As everyone scrabbles to get their head around Safe Harbour following the Schrems decision, Kirsten Whitfield, director of the data protection practice at Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co, considers the latest developments around Safe Harbour.
If your business transfers personal data to the US then you should be considering what practical steps you need to take following the recent decision on Safe Harbour. When the Court of Justice of the European Union's (CJEU) ruled on the invalidity of
Safe Harbour, there was a moment of shocked silence, trailed by a huge buzz about the implications.
In the wake of the CJEU 'Schrems' decision, Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner C-362/14  All ER (D) 34 (Oct), questions have arisen on both sides of the Atlantic but as yet no clear course has emerged to navigate the rough waters ahead.
Ultimately, the solution to personal data transfers to the US (dubbed Safe Harbour 2.0) needs to be hammered out by the politicians.
This does not mean, necessarily, that organisations (either themselves or through third parties) which transfer personal data to the US should do nothing--it is still an option to take some protective steps (even if not completely watertight).
Deciding what to do next will be a risk-based decision that pivots around factors such as the nature of the personal data being transferred outside of the EEA country and the size and nature of the organisation. The Article 29 Working Party's statement
of 16 October and the European Commission's opinion of 6 November (see more on this below) are key to deciding what to do next.
Various opinions from national data protection regulators have also been issued and these will also be important when deciding on next steps/priorities for personal data flows from particular EEA countries. These regulator statements are crucial for
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Since joining LexisNexis in 2009 Sophie has worked on developing our legal and business content for the in-house legal community. She also runs various networking and mentoring groups for in-house lawyers and works with schools to promote social mobility within the legal profession.
0330 161 1234