Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
From 1 April as an in house solicitor you will - in common with your private practice counterparts - have a decision to make regarding your approach to ongoing learning, with the SRA offering you the choice
of either sticking with the existing continuing professional development (CPD) scheme or switching to the SRA’s new “continuing competence” regime.
The indications are that a sizeable proportion of your colleagues are likely to opt for the new approach, with a poll taken during an SRA webinar broadcast on 16 October showing that 30% of the audience was intending to do so. As the scheme will apply
to the entire profession from 1 November 2016, there’s much to be said for being an early adopter and adapting to the new learning culture sooner rather than later.
However, the downside – which was highlighted in the same poll which showed that 60% of the audience was still undecided – is that, with the details of implementation yet to be fully revealed, it’s not entirely clear what you will be
So what do we know about the SRA’s approach to continuing competence?
The most widely reported aspect of the new scheme is the scrapping of the annual requirement for solicitors to undertake 16 hours of CPD. While this has been generally well received by those private practice solicitors who may have struggled to accommodate
learning within a culture emphasizing billable hours, the in house community appears more ambivalent. A survey conducted by the Commerce & Industry Group among its membership last autumn revealed that almost a fifth of respondents felt that their
organization’s attitude to their taking external courses would definitely change and that it may become even harder to obtain budget sign off without the mandatory requirement to complete 16 hours. The likely result of this is that you may become
even more reliant on free training provided by law firms, as informing your employer that you need funding to attend an off-site course to ensure that you can continue to provide a proper standard of service may not sound as compelling.
In tandem with removing the annual hours target, the SRA has also ceased to recognize the distinction between “accredited” and “unaccredited” training and no longer accredits individual training providers. The upshot of this is
that you will now have a wider choice of activities that can satisfy your learning needs. Whilst the SRA admits that accreditation was never a kitemark of quality, you will need to satisfy yourself that the training a provider is offering in the new
deregulated environment is of a sufficient standard to meet your needs.
The SRA’s continuing competence scheme, which replaces the 16 hour target, has similarities with the system which the ICAEW has been running since 2005 and whose members need to complete as much development activity as they feel they need to remain
competent in their role without stipulating a set number of hours.
Underpinning the SRA’s approach is the concept of the “statement of competence”. The statement is essentially a description of the skills, knowledge and abilities that a competent solicitor should possess. We now have a good idea of
what this statement will look like, with the SRA publishing its draft version last October. The consultation period closed on 12
January and, given the tight timescale for roll out, any changes to the final version are likely to be minor. The statement groups the abilities and attributes that competent solicitors should display under four main headings:
With the statement applying to all members of the profession – regardless of what stage of your career you have reached or the type of entity within which you operate – it is necessarily generic in its approach. However, it does appear to
have had reasonable input from the in house community with the SRA stating that 22% of the 1,070 solicitors who were surveyed for their views on the draft version prior to the consultation being issued came from the employed sector.
The competence statement is intended to act as benchmark against which you must assess your own performance and identify any areas for improvement. Having done so, you are then required to devise and implement a training plan to address these deficiencies.
If you want to move to the continuing competence model from April, you simply need to choose to do so – there’s no requirement to inform either your employer or the SRA. However, uncertainties about how the new scheme will work in practice
remain and much less clear at this stage is how the SRA intends that you should demonstrate that you have met the standards set out in the statement and how you should document the steps that you have gone through in developing and implementing your
individual training plan.
Although there’s no firm date for when the SRA will clarify its requirements, it has promised to issue a toolkit on its website in the spring with the SRA’s Director of Education and Training Julie Brannan stating that this toolkit will set
out best practice for training and provide materials that will help practitioners reflect on their practice and keep a training log
Although there are still important questions to be answered, one thing is clear - the abandonment of mandatory CPD certainly doesn’t signal the end of the need for ongoing training and development – although the forms that this will take may
change. In the C&I Group survey mentioned earlier, a majority (62%) of respondents said that they would prefer to receive their training via different delivery methods in the future with over half (55%) citing their preferred training medium
as being podcasts or webinars.
LexisNexis is already seeking to meet this demand by running a series of webinars during 2015 specifically aimed
at in house counsel and covering topics ranging from drafting effective commercial contracts to optimizing your relationship with law firms.
0330 161 1234