2020 Legal Trends to Watch: Payments and open banking

2020 Legal Trends to Watch: Payments and open banking

 

As part of our sector-focused series, we have spoken with our esteemed colleague and financial regulation solictor, Rory Copeland. Below, he gives us his thoughts on the key legal trends to watch in payments for 2020. 

This article focuses on: instant payment fraud, Customer Authentication (SCA), open banking and the privatisation of currency. 

Look out for similar 'Legal Trends to Watch' articles from the series, focusing on different industry sectors and practice areas, and read more of Rory's pieces here.

 

Slowing down instant payment fraud

 

Regulators, industry bodies and government departments all realised in 2019 that ubiquitous instant payments provides a huge market for payment fraud. Specifically, new 'authorised push payment' (APP) services allow a payer (often through the medium of their phone or computer) to send money directly from their bank account to another bank account. These payments don't engage card networks or credit clearing (which occurs when a cheque is sent), so are instant for the most part.

Whilst APP is good news for many businesses and consumers, it also creates a huge market for fraud. APP fraud is a growing phenomenon in the UK and is well-documented. As online and mobile banking has become more widely used, regulatory responses to APP fraud have begun to crystallise and may be implemented in 2020.

Firstly, Confirmation of Payee (CoP) is a mechanism developed by Pay.UK. Every bank account has a unique sort code, account number and account name, but only the former two are needed by payment systems to execute a transfer. Fraudsters can 'intercept' a payment by impersonating the intended payee and providing different account details. CoP will ask a payer to confirm, before a payment is executed, whether the account number to which their payment is directed matches the account name which is in fact tied to that account.

Secondly, 2019 saw the establishment of the APP Voluntary Code, which sets out the protections that banks and other payment service providers (PSP) will put in place for their customers. An important and innovative component of the code is a 'no blame pot' to compensate victims when neither their PSP nor the payee's PSP was at fault in a fraud. PSPs failed to reach a consensus on how to fund the pot in November 2019, but the pressure will be on major financial institutions to ensure the Code is system is impl

Subscription Form

Related Articles:
Latest Articles:

Already a subscriber? Login
RELX (UK) Limited, trading as LexisNexis, and our LexisNexis Legal & Professional group companies will contact you to confirm your email address. You can manage your communication preferences via our Preference Centre. You can learn more about how we handle your personal data and your rights by reviewing our  Privacy Policy.

Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.

Read full article

Already a subscriber? Login

About the author:

Rory is a solicitor in the Financial Regulation team at Pinsent Masons LLP, with personal academic interests in private, public and international law approaches to emerging financial technologies.