Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
At the Lord Chief Justice's press conference on 27th September, Owen Bowcott of The Guardian asked Lord Judge about his views on the issue of the diversity of the judiciary in the UK. In a recent survey by the Council of Europe, it was suggested that we have one of the least diverse judiciaries in Europe coming just above the likes of Azerbaijan. Lord Judge refuted that suggestion by saying that he did not think the survey took into account the lay magistracy in the UK and levels of diversity seen there. He continued developing this theme by saying that ultimately the only decision that should be taken about whether someone becomes a judge is merit. He went on to say that he thought that women and minority candidates would feel insulted if they were made judges just to fill some sort of quota.
I agree that elevation to the bench should be merit based but I would suggest that the talent pool currently being pulled upon is increasingly self-selecting. Lord Judge himself admitted that only 11% of QCs are women, wh
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial. See our full terms here.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234