Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
Find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice with Lexis PSL
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
By James Harper, Executive Sponsor of Rule of Law and CSR at LexisNexis UK
Jury trials sit at the heart of the criminal justice system in England and Wales. The opportunity to put your case before 12 of your peers is so fundamental to how we enact justice, many consider it to be a constitutional right. The Government’s recent proposal to suspend jury trials is a potential threat to the Rule of Law – i.e. a legal system that treats everyone equally and which you can access, no matter who you are.
Restricting access to jury trials for certain offences would damage these rights for many citizens – a huge number of whom have already had to wait an inordinate length of time to have their case heard. Whether accused or victim, this is a huge mental and emotional burden which should not be happening in a modern, first world country.
Part of the excuse for this extraordinary move is the backlog of cases in the magistrates and criminal courts of England and Wales, arising as a direct result of COVID-19. While COIVD-19 restrictions have led to an increase, approximately 97% of the backlog in the Crown Courts pre-dates COVID-19 lockdowns. In the Magistrates Courts, over 80% of the backlog pre-dates COVID-19.
We have to be clear: the pandemic is not the cause of the backlog or the dysfunctional criminal justice system. Instead, years of underinvestment in justice, in legal aid, in the court system, together with reduced sitting days and court closures, have all left a legacy which has only been exacerbated by the current crisis.
The right to trial by your peers is one way of guaranteeing fair treatment. However, removing jury trials would have a hugely disproportionate impact on Black citizens (and, indeed, all those across the BAME community) – at the very moment when we are discussing the inequality of rights arising from years of systemic racism.
BAME individuals are over-represented in the criminal justice system – they are far more likely to end up in the courts. A study by Professor Cheryl Thomas found that “…there is good evidence that members of BAME groups are over-represented at virtually every stage of the criminal justice process in England and Wales relative to their representation in the general population”.
Another study by Professor Thomas found that jury conviction rates showed few differences based on the ethnicity of the defendant – in other words, jury trials are likely to treat people the same regardless of race.
Indeed, that study concluded the jury verdicts are the only part of the criminal justice system where BAME defendants are not disproportionately impacted!
If we are to replace jury trials with judges and magistrates (as is the proposal), we have to look at the diversity of the individuals making these decisions and consider if the above remains the case. However, the truth is that the judiciary and magistracy are incredibly un-diverse. As of July 2019, across Circuit Judges (who hear the bulk of criminal trials), there are 3 individuals who identify as Black/Black British out of a pool of 670. There are 24 BAME judges. There are 581 white judges. 90% of all circuit judges responded to the ethnicity question.
Across the Magistracy, there are over 14,000 individuals. Of that, only 536 identify as Black/Black British – 3.7% of the magistrates. 94% of magistrates responded to the question.
If you are young and black, your chances of finding someone who may understand you or your life or how you have ended up in front of them in the magistracy decrease even further. 12,000 magistrates are over the age of 50 (84%). In fact, 52% are over the age of 60.
It is clear from this data – sourced from the judiciary itself – that the Government’s proposals to remove jury trials would do irreparable damage to the opportunity for many people – whether BAME or otherwise – to receive a fair trial and be treated equally under the law.
In a country where politicians of every stripe claim to hold the Rule of Law dear and use its name as the justification for so much, it is worrying to see it threatened.
This comment forms part of LexisNexis’s global commitment to advancing the Rule of Law around the world, which sits as the central purpose of the organisation. The company advocates for the Rule of Law and carries out various activities to support and advance it, using the skills and talents of its people, and the tools and assets in the business. The company has also recently established a not-for-profit entity – the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation – to help the organisation give this work an ever-widening reach across the globe.
The LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation is a strictly not-for-profit entity established to advance the rule of law around the world. Some of the Foundation’s key partners include the United Nations, Global Investigative Journalism Network, International Bar Association and Union Internationale des Avocats (UIA).
James Harper is a lawyer who has worked at LexisNexis for over 7 years. He also serves as a Trustee and Director of the London Legal Support Trust, an independent charity that raises funds for free legal services in London and the South East, and has been involved in pro bono work since the start of his career.
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Director, Customer Success and Engagement
Exec Sponsor, Rule of Law and CSR
James works for LexisNexis, a leading global provider of legal, regulatory and business information, technology and analytics, and is based in their London office. He joined LN in 2012 as its UK General Counsel and was promoted to its board 2 years later. In 2015, James also took on responsibility for leading the UK Rule of Law and CSR programmes. He is currently on secondment in a business role, as the Director of Customer Success and Engagement.
In addition to his duties as UK General Counsel, James also led the legal function for LexisNexis South Africa and for regulatory media organisation MLex after its acquisition in 2015.
In line with a personal passion for access to justice, James leads LexisNexis’s work in the UK on advancing the Rule of Law, with a focus on supporting digitisation in the free legal advice community. He also heads up the UK CSR programme, encouraging employee volunteering and giving, making a positive impact on society and the communities around us.
In his current role, James runs a team of c.40 individuals that sit at the front-line of our business, ensuring customers get the most value from our products and future customers can make informed and objective decisions when moving to services and tools within our product portfolio.
James began his career in private practice (at SJ Berwin), specialising in contracts, IP, IT, outsourcing and other commercial matters, before moving in-house to investment bank Barclays Capital in 2010.
Away from the office, James is a Trustee for the London Legal Support Trust, an Officer of the International Bar Association, and an FA Level 1 Football Coach.
0330 161 1234