Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
‘The problem is that most senior lawyers think only two months ahead. They have no coherent picture of the future. The planning is not being done. And it is senior lawyers who need to be driving change.’ Professor Richard Susskind (May 2009)
I am not sure whether Richard Susskind’s comment is still a fair reflection of the strategic planning by all law firms, because—to my knowledge—many have over the past decade made serious efforts to plan for their futures, and these plans are now bearing fruit. However, for others there seems to be no forward planning being done, as shown by the problems around succession planning where many lawyers put their heads in the sand when it comes to ‘future proofing’ their firms.
I have for many years working with law firms, used the following as a template to help law firms think through their future planning. Create a realistic plan or course of action:
This needs to be differentiated from unrealistic and unachievable ‘wish lists’ and implementation—the ‘making it happen’.
The above definition raises some fundamental questions which will need to be asked:
In addition, questions such as the following need to be regularly asked and answered as part of the strategic thinking process:
The most fundamental strategic issues currently needing to be addressed include:
Strategic planning therefore needs to be a process of finding out:
Doing this will enable a law firm to identify the key skills and behaviours that will enable it to consistently deliver what its clients will require if the firm is to gain competitive advantage.
One of the most important current trends in relation to strategic thinking relates to how to provide clients with what they really want.
Research published in April 2017 by LexisNexis in conjunction with the Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, revealed evidence of a serious disconnect between what clients expect from law firms and what they get.
Some headline findings included:
To deal with this issue, a law firm should commission an external survey of:
Another trend in relation to how strategic planning is managed is scenario planning which is being driven by some of the challenges around Brexit. Law firms need to understand and plan how to be prepared for the impact of the driving forces relating to Brexit which are creating the current uncertainty.
Scenario planning was developed to deal with such uncertain futures. Traditional processes of strategic planning and decision–making require reasonably foreseeable outcomes but, at the moment in relation to Brexit, none exist. As a result, law firms now need to rethink how best to go about their planning for a post–Brexit world.
A strategic planning tool such as PESTLE (political, economic, social, technological, legal and environmental) can be used to scan external influences and help a business analyse the different forces in play to arrive at a series of different scenarios.
To deal with these issues, law firms must be agile and focus strongly on change management, have quick response times to threats and strategic opportunities, have streamlined decision-making processes and have people who are open-minded, flexible and prepared to learn new skills and ways of operating.
However, decision-making in law firms, particularly when it comes to making decisions regarding spending money, can be difficult. This may be partly down to the flat structure of many law firms—many are still culturally partnerships in behaviour even if they may be corporately structured. It may also be an issue that lawyers are trained to advise clients and not trained to take decisions and so they have difficulty in decision-making when it comes to their own businesses.
It would seem that some firms have been more willing to take big risks in investment decisions which they would never advise their clients to take, and arguably without really thinking through the downside risks, as some recent law firm failures have shown. Taking on a long-term liability such as an expensive office lease without break clauses for the tenant is an example of where law firms can badly get it wrong, even though they would never advise a client to do so.
When making investment decisions, eg a new IT system, I would always advise a law firm to take the best possible independent and objective external advice. Doing so will most likely help to provide comfort to partners and ensure that they buy into the decision, as well as providing some cover for management if it ultimately goes wrong!
Interviewed by Samantha Gilbert
0330 161 1234