Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
Find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice with Lexis PSL
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
In Pyrrho, the High Court approved the use of “predictive coding”
(to facilitate the technology/computer assisted review of documents) in the disclosure process.
While judicial approval was not actually required – and Pyrrho is not the first case in which the technology has been used for e-disclosure in England and Wales – the judgment will serve as a useful guide and precedent to litigants
considering the use of this technology in future cases.
But what exactly is predictive coding and why did the Court approve its use?
Most e-disclosure is currently conducted by searching digital documents for keywords and then manually reviewing those that do. This is inherently time-intensive (and hence expensive).
A particular challenge of this approach is to strike a balance between excluding potentially relevant documents (keywords are too few or too narrow) and wasting time and/or money reviewing too many irrelevant documents (using too many keywords or keywords
that are too wide).
Surfacing potentially relevant documents based on keywords results in a binary output. Either the document contains one or more keywords – or it does not. Actual relevance is not determined until the resultant batch of documents has been manually
By contrast, predictive coding seeks to determine the likely relevance of each document, thus automating much/most of the review process itself.
The central part of the process is known as “machine learning” and essentially involves 3 steps:
A batch of documents is selected to form a “seed set”. The parties are free to agree selection criteria (which may include some use of keywords as identifiers) but the process would work equally well with a randomly generated seed set.
There are no prescribed parameters around what percentage of the total data set should be included. In Pyrrho, the parties estimated th
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234