Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
Find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice with Lexis PSL
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
By Richard Burcher
I have heard value pricing variously described as “what the client will stand”, “making up a figure”, “hourly billing plus some more”, and “ask the client what they think it is worth”.
Firms are deluded if they think that their future lies in this sort of approach, lacking as it does, in any honesty, integrity or rigour.
Modern legal services pricing should be about the optimal alignment of the fee, the clients’ perception that they have received fair value, and the lawyers’ perception that they have been paid properly (which, to state the obvious, has absolutely nothing to do with arbitrary and homogenous hourly rates).
To restate one of my favourite judicial quotes: “the business of determining a fee that is fair to both the client and the lawyer is an exercise in assessment, an exercise in balanced judgment, not an arithmetical calculation”.
At the heart of this assessment conundrum is an easily articulated, yet extremely elusive concept, and that is pricing fairness. In this context, fairness has nothing to do with the quantum of the fee.
A fee could run to several hundred thousand pounds, yet still be perceived by both the client and the firm as “fair”, even exceptionally good value - whilst a fee of a few hundred dollars might be seen by the client as a “rip-off”. An hourly rate of £100 could be unfair and poor value from the clients’ perspective, whilst an extrapolated hourly rate of £3,000 may be a “steal”.
But when you transgress the fairness threshold, wherever it may lie, look out as you will be punished. Consider the swift public responses to the following random examples of companies whose pricing their consumers deemed unfair:
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234