Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
We started by identifying three headline topics, with a focus on the legal industry. These were focused on the “user” and included:
Twenty participants were divided into (you guessed it) three teams – one to focus on each of the three topics listed above.
Preparation was simple: turn up with an open mind, ready to be inquisitive.
To set the tone and parameters for the event, we set five simple rules:
1. Have fun
Don’t take the day too seriously.
2. Be open and collaborative
You are creating something together, which you couldn’t have done alone.
3. Thou shalt not kill...ideas too quickly
Less discussion, more action - instead of over-debating, create something and then you can test it.
4. Don't stress!
The jam is equally about the intangible outputs, such as meeting new people and learning from those around you.
5. Don't worry about fidelity
Visualise in the way that works best for your proposition and based on the time you have. There are no key deliverables.
these rules in place, the teams were given eight hours to “jam” on their respective topics – and to come up with a design for a better world.
The teams themselves drew together people with a wide a range of skills and experiences both inside and outside the legal industry. Teams included specialists in design thinking and service design well as those with a diverse range of roles within the
legal industry such as Legal Knowledge Engineers, Enterprise Architects & Senior Associates.
The experience of having “fresh eyes” on the legal industry allowed us to start wide, mapping out the landscape of ‘big’ problems, before narrowing in to focus on what to work on in detail.
The first session aimed to capture the “flare” or breadth of the issues around the topic. Participants began a post-it note brain dump of all the problems, barriers and issues they could think of related to the topic. Talking about
barriers and issued faced on a daily basis quickly broke any ice. Participants worked together to cluster the issues into the main themes they saw emerging.
Each team decided what stood out for them as the key issues. But, remember the focus on the user? The coffee break gave participants the opportunity to do just that - interact with other delegates, validate what they saw as the key issues, collect more
depth, get insights from legal experts and rate the right ideas to take forward.
Interacting with the user in Design Thinking stops the group becoming internally focused. It allows the voice of the end user or key stakeholders be heard. And of course reminds you that any solution must work for them.
After consolidating feedback and rejigging themes the teams took to creating their concepts:
The People team focused on a matrix of where skills and talents sit within a law firm – they mapped roles and skills between experience and inexperience (senior/junior) and the legal/non-legal divide. (You can see the original model and read about
some of the insights that came out of that exercise here: Enter the matrix: mapping skills in a typical law firm.)
The other two teams (process and technology) took specific examples and began to map out the as-is processes for these with the experts on the team.
Despite the different paths, the main thing to emerge here was the mapping not just of processes but of the actors in those processes, including clients and opposing sides. Understanding the who as well as the what in legal processes is key. This marries
to the use of personas within design thinking to remember who is doing what and what their motivations are.
In building out a better world, the teams took slightly different approaches as well.
The Technology team looked at how and where new technology could help the process they had defined. The People team started to map out a timeline of skills gathering and skills re-utilisation in a system that started before you even joined as part of
the recruitment process. The Process team got creative drawing out a cartoon of what the world would look like with their system to “not reinvent the process wheel” within a process led system that pulled together teams and gave clarity
of progress to their client.
Team Process used the last hour to design the front-end of their storyboard. Whilst not advisable to do this in an hour (Google do Design Sprints over a week) it goes to show what can be done with a framework discipline, innovative minds and people
with the right mindset.
The Service Designer used a variety of techniques to get the teams collaborating openly, making sure fresh feedback was constantly coming in and working through the tough task of mapping and improving processes. This was powerful as it steered the team
clear of solutions until they understood what the problem was in the first place.
As touched on above, in just eight hours all three teams identified challenges that will be familiar to many people across the legal industry and – perhaps more importantly – made a solid start on proposing workable solutions to being addressing
them. The output from these sessions is captured in a series of three ‘mini-reports’ which are linked to at the end of this article: Legal Service Design Jams – 9x times more productive than Jack Bauer.
In addition to the ideas themselves, we also finished the day with a number of lessons and insights about the process of ‘jamming’. In particular, the event underlined the importance of:
1. Being user-centered - who are we designing for, keeping them front and centre at all times.
2. Experimenting - there were a few dead ends but people were willing to doing things differently,
3. Creativity - looking for opportunities and mixing skills creatively to create the concepts
4. Being ‘intentional’ – we were not just doing things in a void, everyone was grounded in their organisations and how they work (or should work) and think how to achieve real things in that context
5. Iterating – each stage is a step forward, but be willing to amend course as more information insight comes to hand or your concept prompts insights you’d not have got otherwise.
Report 1: People
Report 2: Process
Report 3: Technology
If you would like to discuss anything in this article or would like to find out more about facilitating a design jam of your own, please contact Alex Smith (Senior
Product Lead - Platform Innovation, at LexisNexis UK).
0330 161 1234