Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
Corporate Crime analysis: What are the main practical issues with implementing and enforcing the government’s Action Plan? Zia Ullah, partner, and Victoria Turner, associate, in the financial services disputes and investigations team at Eversheds, explore some of the key issues.
The Action Plan includes a wide-ranging set of proposals, including:
Top of the list is the reform of the current suspicious activity report process and supervisory regime and the strengthening of enforcement agencies powers. The Home Office will hold central responsibility. They will have an October 2018 deadline for full implementation. Capability and capacity building will be led by the National Crime Agency (NCA), who have until June 2017 to deliver the up-skilling programme for high-end money laundering.
Increasing international reach is a key theme, with the NCA due to create new International Liaison Officer posts in a number of important jurisdictions before the end of 2017. A complex area will be the plan for the UK to work the G20 Financial Action Task Force and others on international information-sharing, looking at the impact of data protection rules and other issues. Naturally the anti-terrorism plans are also heavily international, with the National Terrorist Financial Investigation Unit, Foreign and Commonwealth Office and Charity Commission all having a role to play.
Can you identify any cross-jurisdictional issues in relation to enforcement?
Second, technical and procedural differences (and, in some cases, fairly clear deficiencies) across international legal systems will always be complicated for enforcers to manage.
Finally, de-prioritisation of international requests compared within domestic enforcement activity is always an issue, as is the inherent complexity of the Mutual Legal Assistance system. Experience has shown that effective international enforcement often depends on very close working—for example, providing dedicated UK individuals based in the other territory—which is not always practical to achieve.
What challenges must be overcome if the Action Plan is to work in practice?
What is the likely impact of the Action Plan for corporate crime lawyers?
Considering the more sophisticated, partnering role the Action Plan envisages that, for business in relation to the most serious areas of risk, clients will need assistance that is similar in some respects to the anti-bribery and corruption work arising from the Bribery Act 2010. The government is proposing new corporate criminal offences regarding failing to prevent money laundering and failing to prevent fraud, which we envisage will be similar to that of the current failing to prevent bribery offence. Understanding how these new offences will potentially shape AML frameworks of regulated entities and how they will feed into the requirement for both regulated and non-regulated firms to implement adequate procedures, will be vital.
Trying to move beyond box-ticking to a more of an partnership approach may also make legal advice itself less concerned with compliance, shifting towards how clients can show themselves as effectively and responsibility discharging their new obligations in a trusted relationship with the regulators.
Zia Ullah is a specialist in financial crime. He advises on a range of regulatory compliance issues with specific focus on sanctions, AML, plus anti-bribery and anti-corruption. He was previously the global head of sanctions at Barclays.
Victoria Turner specialises in financial crime, fraud, AML, anti-bribery and corruption compliance and international financial sanctions. Victoria frequently conducts audits upon AML and sanction control frameworks of a variety of payment institutions. She also regularly advises clients in respect of compliance issues, internal financial sanctions, the Money Laundering Regulations 2007 and the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
Interviewed by Kate Beaumont.
The views expressed by our Legal Analysis interviewees are not necessarily those of the proprietor.
0330 161 1234