SEC review of Money Market Funds regulation: what’s the potential impact?

SEC review of Money Market Funds regulation: what’s the potential impact?

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed wide-ranging reforms to the regulation of money market funds (MMFs). But do they go far enough and will they revive investor confidence? Jay G Baris, Partner and Chair of the Investment Management practice at Morrison Foerster, New York, considers the implications for the industry.

A number of proposals have been put forward by the SEC for reforming the structure of MMFs. Regulators have been looking at methods to limit the risk posed by the $2.9 trillion money fund industry, since an avalanche of withdrawals helped to freeze bank and corporate funding markets during the financial crisis almost five years ago.

In summary, what changes are proposed?

The SEC has put forward numerous reforms of the regulation of money market funds, but essentially there are two main stand-alone proposals, which mean the SEC could adopt either one individually, or in tandem with each other:

  1. 1.      A floating net asset value (NAV)

Under this proposal an institutional prime MMF would no longer be able to round up an NAV to the nearest dollar. Rather, the investors in a fund would have to purchase and sell their shares at whatever the value of the NAV is at the point of sale; it wouldn’t be fixed at $1. The proposals do not apply to government or retail funds. This means that they define a retail fund as one that restricts redemptions by any one shareholder to no more than $1 million a day.

  1. 2.      Liquidity fees and ‘gates’
  • Fees: If the weekly liquidity of the MMF falls below 15% of the fund’s total assets, then the fund must impost a 2% redemption fee unless the fund’s board of directors determines that a redemption fee is not in the best interest of the fund, or that a lower fee would be in the fund’s best interest. This proposal

Subscription Form

Related Articles:
Latest Articles:

Already a subscriber? Login
RELX (UK) Limited, trading as LexisNexis, and our LexisNexis Legal & Professional group companies will contact you to confirm your email address. You can manage your communication preferences via our Preference Centre. You can learn more about how we handle your personal data and your rights by reviewing our  Privacy Policy.

Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.

Read full article

Already a subscriber? Login

About the author:
Prior to joining LexisNexis Michelle worked at Bingham McCutchen LLP as a financial services associate in Washington, DC and London. At Bingham, Michelle represented financial institutions in connection with regulatory investigations and enforcement actions and advised UK and foreign broker-dealers regarding doing business in the USA. Michelle spent 6 months on secondment at JP Morgan in New York.