Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
Printer Friendly Version
Following the adoption of a number of delegated Acts containing implementing and regulatory technical standards, Simon Lovegrove, head of financial services knowledge global at Norton Rose Fulbright, examines the key provisions which will impact on the way UK financial institutions organise their business.
While the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II) and the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (EU) 600/2014 (MiFIR) have been delayed by a year and won’t come into effect until 3 January 2018, the first half of 2016 has been a particularly busy period with the Commission adopting a number of delegated Acts that contain regulatory technical standards and implementing technical standards that add further detail to the framework Directive and Regulation. Indeed, many firms have found it difficult keeping pace with the volume of paper being published, so in June 2016 the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) helpfully published a table setting out the status of each technical standard.
On 25 April 2016, the Commission adopted a Delegated Regulation supplementing MiFID II as regards organisational requirements and operating conditions for investment firms and defined terms for the purposes of the Directive. Accompanying annexes were also published.
Chapter II of the Delegated Regulation of 25 April 2016 (arts 21–43) sets out the organisational requirements for investment firms. In particular it sets out procedures in relation to compliance, risk management, internal audit, the responsibility of senior management, complaints handling, remuneration, personal transactions, outsourcing and conflicts of interest. Each of these topics is important in their own right but the headlines include the following:
Chapter III of the Delegated Regulation of 25 April 2016 (arts 44–79) sets out the operating conditions for investment firms. In particular it sets out further information in relation to satisfying the requirement that information addressed to retail and professional clients is fair, clear and not misleading (art 44).
MiFID II introduces the concept of ‘independent’ versus ‘non-independent’ advice, for firms which provide the service of investment advice to their clients. The Delegated Regulation (arts 52 and 53) sets out further information concerning the related disclosures, policies and processes that are required, depending on the status selected by the firm.
The provisions in the Delegated Regulation concerning best execution (arts 64–66) are useful in the sense that they:
In terms of client order handling (arts 67–70), the Delegated Regulation sets out general principles which are then followed by the conditions that must be met when investment firms wish to aggregate orders and allocate trades, including for own account and the publication of unexecuted client limit orders.
The Delegated Regulation also provides further detail regarding the new telephone taping requirements (art 76). Importantly, this specifies the content requirements of the written telephone taping policy and the fact that the arrangements instituted to comply with the recording requirements are ‘technology neutral’. It also covers the client disclosure requirements.
On record keeping generally it is also worth noting that the annexes set out a prescriptive list of detailed record keeping requirements.
The Delegated Regulation of 25 April 2016 (arts 84–89) provides guidance on data provision obligations for reporting services providers (approved publication arrangements (APAs) and consolidated tape providers (CTPs)). The transparency framework under MiFID II provides that reporting services providers are required to provide market data on a reasonable commercial basis.
The articles in the Delegated Regulation discuss the provision of market data on the basis of cost. This is where the price of market data is to be based on the cost of producing and disseminating such data and may include ‘a reasonable margin’. The costs of producing and disseminating market data may also include an ‘appropriate share’ of joint costs for other services provided by the APA or CTP.
APAs and CTPs are also required to make market data available at the same price and on the same terms and conditions to all customers falling within the same category in accordance with published objective criteria. Any differentials in prices charged to different categories of customers is to be proportionate to the value which the market data represent to those customers taking into account:
The Delegated Regulation also discusses per user fees where the APA and CTP can charge for the use of market data on the basis of the use made by individual end-users of the market data although a derogation from this is also set out and relates to instances where such charging would be disproportionate to the cost of making market data available. However, should an APA or CTP refuse to make market data available on a per-user basis it must publish the grounds for its refusal on its website.
Finally, the Delegated Regulation covers the transparency obligation, where APAs and CTPs are to disclose and make easily available to the public the price and other terms and conditions for the provision of market data. The Delegated Regulation (art 89) sets out what the disclosure should include.
At the very end of the Delegated Regulation of 25 April 2016 (art 90) further guidance is given for regulators when determining whether the operations of a regulated market, an MTF or OTF are of substantial importance to a host Member State. The background to this provision can be found in art 79(2) of MiFID II and concerns the establishment of cooperation arrangements between a trading venue’s home and host Member State competent authorities.
In terms of MTFs and OTFs the Delegated Regulation refers to the trading venue being registered as a small- and medium-sized enterprise growth market or having a market share of at least 10% of trading in terms of total turnover in monetary terms in on-venue trading and systematic internaliser trading in the host Member State in at least one asset class subject to the transparency obligations in MiFIR.
Interviewed by Susan Ghaiwal.
The views expressed by our Legal Analysis interviewees are not necessarily those of the proprietor.
0330 161 1234