Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
What does the policy statement from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) on contractual stays mean in practice? Christopher Leonard, partner at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer and Feld, comments on the final proposals related to contractual stays in financial contracts governed by third-country law.
PRA rules on contractual stays in financial contracts governed by third-country law, LNB News 16/11/2015 110
A policy statement from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) sets out final rules aimed at reducing the risk of contagion from the failure of a relevant firm and supporting its orderly resolution. The rules ensure resolution action taken in relation to a firm would not immediately lead to the early termination of its financial arrangements (or those of its subsidiaries) governed by third-country law while similar financial arrangements governed by the UK laws, or those of another European Economic Area jurisdiction, are stayed.
What is the background to final rules?
In the summer of 2008 you would have been hard-pressed to find many people outside central banks, university economics departments and a small number of hedge fund managers with exceptional foresight who spent much time thinking about ‘financial contagion risk’ or who even really understood what it meant. When Lehman Brothers collapsed in September of that year the dominoes began to fall—the collapse triggered a series of contractual defaults and cross-defaults that quickly spread from Lehman through its counterparties and into the ‘real economy’—and all of a sudden the term was observed in action and widely understood.
In the aftermath of the financial crisis there has been a great deal of work—both within the UK and at international level—to provide governments, central banks and financial regulators with an enhanced ‘toolkit’ of powers which are intended to help them manage and mitigate the consequences of a significant financial institution suffering an insolvency event.
One of those tools is the EU Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) which establishes a harmonised framework for the recovery and resolution
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234