Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
When do investment schemes amount to collective investment schemes (CISs) to require the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) authorisation? Michael Wainwright, partner at Dentons, looks at the Court of Appeal’s interpretation of CISs in the case of FCA v Capital Alternatives and the impact of this judgment on commercial ventures.
Financial Conduct Authority v Capital Alternatives Ltd and others  EWCA Civ 284,  All ER (D) 280 (Mar)
The FCA brought an action against the promoters and operators of four investment schemes to establish whether they were collective investment schemes within the meaning of the Financial Service and Markets Act 2000, s 235 (FSMA 2000). The judge held that they were. The operators appealed and the FCA cross-appealed. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, clarified the meaning of the phrase ‘the property is managed as a whole’ within FSMA 2000, s 235(3)(b) and held that the schemes had been collective investment schemes. Further, the FCA’s cross-appeal was dismissed as it had been open to the judge, in order to understand how the scheme would work, to consider the scheme brochure, which had not formed a part of the contractual arrangements for the scheme.
What is the background to this case?
The defendants operated a number of schemes for investment in farm harvests and carbon credits. This case looked at whether the schemes were being operated and promoted without the required authorisation of the FCA as CISs. Th
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234