Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Family analysis: When should care proceedings be transferred to a ‘better placed’ court in another Member State? William Tyler QC, of 36 Bedford Row and Park Square Barristers, examines the Supreme Court’s approach to that question in Re N (Children) (Jurisdiction: Care Proceedings).
Re N (Children) (Jurisdiction: Care Proceedings)  UKSC 15,  All ER (D) 71 (Apr)
The Supreme Court allowed an appeal by the children’s guardian and the local authority against a decision that the Hungarian court was better placed to hear a case regarding two children and that transferring the case to Hungary would be in the children’s best interests. The children were Hungarian nationals born in the UK to Hungarian parents. The transfer request would be set aside and the case would be returned to the Family Division.
What was the case about?
Two Hungarian Roma children were the subject of care and adoption proceedings in England. The mother’s application for a request to be made that the case be transferred to Hungary was only eventually decided after the judge had heard all of the evidence but before he gave his final welfare judgment. He decided to make the request of the Hungarian courts. If accepted, this would have had the inevitable effect that not only would the case be immediately transferred to Hungary, but so would the children, who had by that time been living for a considerable time with an English-speaking foster carer who wished, with the support of the local authority, to adopt both children.
What were the issues in the appeals?
In November 2015, the Court of Appeal handed down a mammoth and wide-ranging judgment, running to 192 paragraphs in Re N (Children) (Adoption: Jurisdiction)  EWCA Civ 1112,  All ER (D) 32 (Nov).
That judgment dealt with:
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234