Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Family analysis: The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has issued National Guidance for the Family Court (the Guidance) in light of COVID-19 setting out details of which hearings may be suitable for a remote hearing, technical aspects, provision as to e-bundles and which party must liaise with the court to arrange and record the remote hearing. A draft directions order and guidance issued in relation to the Financial Remedies Court are also annexed to the Guidance.
The President of the Family Division: National Guidance for the Family Court (19 March 2020)
What principles are set out in the Guidance?
The Guidance was issued with the approval of the Lord Chief Justice and the Senior Presiding Judge and is in immediate effect at all levels of the Family Court and in the High Court Family Division. The principles underlying the Guidance are that:
The President has confirmed that in contrast to jury trials in the Crown Court, there is no category of case that may be listed in the Family Court which necessarily requires the physical attendance of key participants in the same courtroom. The determination of whether or not a remote hearing is to take place will not therefore turn on the estimated length of the hearing, but on other case specific factors.
Which cases are suitable for a remote hearing?
The Guidance sets out a list of categories of hearing that are suitable for remote hearing, ie:
Where a case in one of the categories listed above has already been listed for a hearing at which the parties are due to attend court then, if it is possible to make arrangements for the fixed hearing to be conducted remotely, then the hearing should go ahead remotely without any personal attendance at court. A draft directions order is at Appendix A of the Guidance.
The President has confirmed the need for a flexible approach, saying:
‘It is possible that other cases may also be suitable to be dealt with remotely. As the current situation is changing so rapidly, and as the circumstances that will impact upon this decision are likely to differ from court to court and from day to day, the question of whether any particular case is heard remotely must be determined on a case-by-case basis.’
Where a case cannot be listed for a remote hearing:
The President says that recent experience has demonstrated that it is possible to conduct a complicated extensive multi-party hearing using the Skype for Business system available on judicial laptops. In other cases it may be necessary for there to be personal attendance at court, for some or all of the hearing, by some or all of the participants.
See also the guidance issued by HMCTS on telephone and video hearings during the coronavirus outbreak here.
How should urgent hearings be dealt with?
In relation to urgent cases, the President’s guidance states:
‘Even where a case is urgent, it should be possible for arrangements to be made for it to be conducted remotely. The default position should be that the hearing is conducted remotely. Where a case is genuinely urgent, and it is not possible to conduct a remote hearing and there is a need for pressing issues to be determined, then the court should endeavour to conduct a face-to-face hearing in circumstances (in terms of the physical arrangement of the court room and in the waiting area) which minimise the opportunity for infection.’
What technical guidance is included in the Guidance?
The Guidance states that remote hearings may be conducted using the following facilities as appropriate to the individual case:
The responsibility for making technical and other arrangements for a remote hearing, and for confirming the details of the arrangements for the hearing to the other parties no later than 24 hours prior to the remote hearing taking place, is to be undertaken by the following party by liaising with the court:
The President says that:
‘When conducting a remote hearing, there is a need for the judge or magistrates to use their best endeavours to ensure that only those who would be allowed into the court room for an oral hearing are privy to the remote hearing and that all parties understand that the system used by the court will record the proceedings and that no other recording is to be made by any of the parties.’
What are the requirements for bundles?
The requirements for the filing of an e-bundle are that on the day before a remote hearing the applicant must electronically file a PDF bundle which complies with Family Procedure Rules 2010, PD 27A, and which in any event must include as a minimum:
Geraldine Morris is a solicitor and head of LexisPSL Family.
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial. See our full terms here.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Geraldine is Head of LexisPSL Family. She was admitted as a solicitor in 1992 and was in practice for 15 years, most recently as a partner and head of the family team at Hart Brown, a large Surrey firm.
Geraldine writes for Butterworths Family Law Service and is a past editor of the Resolution Review. She has been published in the New Law Journal, the Law Society Gazette and the District Judges’ Bulletin as well as in the national press including the Times and the Telegraph.
When in practice she was a member of the Law Society Family and Children Panels, and an accredited Resolution Specialist with a focus on advanced financial provision and pensions. A past Resolution regional secretary and press officer, Geraldine also contributed chapters to the Resolution publications, International Aspects of Family Law (3rd Edition 2009) and The Modern Family (2012).
0330 161 1234