Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Continuing our thoughts on the Rugby World Cup, in the quarter-final stage Scotland were denied a famous victory against Australia by the (controversial) decision of referee Craig Joubert to award Australia a last minute penalty, which television replays
showed should not have been awarded.
In our post yesterday, in which we looked at the disciplinary process the players conduct is subject to and it
was noted by our guest blogger that decisions by a referee are not subject to the same disciplinary process.
Following World Rugby's statement that the referee had made the wrong decision and that there should have been an Australian scrum rather than a penalty
we have been considering what action, if any, the Scottish RFU might have considered taking against World Rugby.
Our guest blogger and sports law expert Daniel Saoul suggests that it is extremely unlikely the decision could lead to legal action. He said:
"It is an accepted part of the framework that referees are responsible for these sorts of decisions and part of the rules of the game is to accept to be bound by them – that is sport, basically. Likewise for political reasons it is impossible to
envisage the Scottish RFU suing World Rugby, for example. What is more likely is a review of which incidents can be referred to the Television Match Official, since this was one which the referee was not permitted to refer, under the current regime,
and it would self-evidently have made a massive – indeed life-changing – difference if he could have done so.
That said, there is some precedent for legal action to be considered in relation to sporting decisions; in June 2015 Fifa paid the Football Association of Ireland 5m euros (£3.6m) to stop legal action after France controversially beat Ireland in a World Cup play-off.
Different sports, different organisations of course. However, it is unusual for World Rugby to make such a categorical statement that the wrong refereeing decision had been made.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234