Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Myanmar has enacted a new arbitration law (the Myanmar Arbitration Act) giving domestic effect to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 (the New York Convention). Shaun Lee, supervising associate at JWS Asia Law Corporation, examines the likely impact of the new law.
The Myanmar Arbitration Act (the ‘Act’) was enacted on 5 January 2016. This follows from Myanmar having signed up to the New York Convention on 16 April 2013 and having introduced the draft Arbitration Bill in 2014. The Act is modelled
on the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (the ‘Model Law’), which makes it part of a family of 72 states in a total of 102 jurisdictions. Key aspects of international
arbitration and its processes and procedures are recognised in the Act. These include:
The Act also adopts a dual-arbitration regime in that domestic arbitrations and international arbitrations are governed differently. Like other jurisdictions, domestic arbitrations are subject to greater court scrutiny and supervision. In particular,
there is a right of appeal against a domestic arbitration award, unless such a right is excluded by agreement of the parties. The Act does, however, provide that such appeals are limited to questions of law.
The Act would undoubtedly bolster foreign investors’ confidence and remedy the perceived weaknesses of dispute resolution in Myanmar. On a purely textual analysis, the Act is modelled on international best practice (the Model Law) and appears to
meet its stated aims.
However, recent history and experience has shown that even Model Law States have diverged in terms of arbitration practice and on matters such as subject-matter arbitrability and the enforceability of unilateral arbitration clauses. Until there are actual
cases determined by the Myanmar court, there will remain uncertainties as to the interpretation and application of the New York Convention and the Act.
Further, a lot will also depend on the judicial attitude and practice towards arbitration and the enforcement of arbitral awards. A pro-arbitration and pro-enforcement judicial attitude will be integral to the success of the Act and arbitration in Myanmar.
Finally, we are not aware if the relevant rules of court have been promulgated to give effect to the Act. In so far as Myanmar is a common law system, such rules will be critical for commercial parties who wish to have a foreign award recognised and enforced
in Myanmar, or to seek the assistance of the Myanmar courts in aid of the arbitration.
Nonetheless, it must be emphasised that Myanmar has liberalised and modernised its laws at a remarkable pace since liberalisation of its political system in 2011. The enactment of the Myanmar Arbitration Act is merely the latest step and is a very encouraging
one for commercial parties and foreign investors.
Lexis®PSL Dispute Resolution can enjoy the complete overview of arbitration law and access the full interview with Shaun Lee here.
Click here for a free trial to access if you are not a PSL subscriber.
The author would like to caveat that the official English translation of the Myanmar Arbitration Act has not been issued by the government and that therefore his answers are subject to translational errors.
Interviewed by Sean Delaney.
The views expressed by our Legal Analysis interviewees are not necessarily those of the proprietor.
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial. See our full terms here.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234