Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
In a recent judgment, the High Court dismissed an application for an interim injunction or specific performance by professional musicians who had been employed to perform in the National Theatre’s production of War Horse at the New London Theatre.
The musicians sought an order requiring the National Theatre to continue to engage them in the live show until the trial of their claim.
The musicians’ contracts had been terminated following a decision by the National Theatre that a live band was no longer necessary and that all the music for the show would be pre-recorded.
The court applied the familiar American Cynamid test for interim relief, namely:
Lexis®PSL Dispute Resolution customers can read more about the guiding principles for when the court will grant interim injunctions here.
Although the court found that there was a serious issue to be tried regarding the National Theatre’s entitlement to terminate the contracts (and that the claimants’ prospects in that respect were thought to be strong), the court was not convinced that they had any prospects of success at trial in relation to the remedy sought.
Contrary to the claimants’ arguments, Cranston J found that this was a ‘standard case’ where loss of confidence was the primary obstacle to the claimants obtaining the relief sought:
‘The plain fact is that the production of a play necessarily entails close cooperation between all those involved, the actors and those directing and producing the play.’
Giving the decision a further, interesting dimension, the court also found that the right to artistic expression, as protected by article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, had a significant role to play in the application of the American Cynamid test.
Sections 12(1) and 12(4) of the Human Rights Act 1998 provide that in considering whether to grant any relief that may affect the right of freedom of expression in article 10, the court must have regard to the importance of that right. The court stated that it was clear from the Strasbourg jurisprudence that article 10 protects artistic expression.
Cranston J stated that the decisions of producers and artistic teams in staging plays are protected by article 10 and that the effect of the order sought by the claimants in this case would be to interfere with the National Theatre’s right of artistic freedom. In the court’s view, interference with that right was not necessary or proportionate to the protection of the rights of the claimant, which were adequately protected by a claim in damages.
Finally, the court also found that the balance of convenience lay in favour of not granting the relief sought as it would involve unwinding the production of War Horse without the band and forcing the creative team to work with musicians pending trial, despite not believing that they contribute positively to the play.
Although the court’s decision will be very disappointing to the claimants, and to those in favour of live accompaniment to the show, it was in line with authority and in accordance with the American Cynamid principles.
Citation: Ashworth & Ors v The Royal National Theatre  EWHC 1176 (QB) Note that the full judgment is available for Lexis®Library subscribers here.
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial. See our full terms here.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Barry specialises in international arbitration and commercial litigation. He trained and practised at Jones Day before joining Pinsent Masons. At LexisNexis, Barry is Head of Arbitration and Head of the Lexis®PSL Dispute Resolution Group.
In practice, Barry’s work included commercial, aviation and technology arbitrations pursuant to international arbitral rules, involving UK and international clients. He also has a background in general commercial, civil fraud and IT litigation, including experience before the High Court. While in private practice, Barry worked with a broad range of clients from the private and public sectors.
At LexisNexis, when not focused on the strategic development and operational requirements of the Dispute Resolution Group, Barry’s content work focuses on the law and practice of international commercial arbitration and investment treaty arbitration. In addition to his work for Lexis®PSL, Barry contributes to the LexisNexis Dispute Resolution Blog and New Law Journal on litigation and arbitration matters
0330 161 1234