Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
The CPR rules below were laid before Parliament and approved on 1 April 2014 in the Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 4) Rules 2014, SI 2014/867. The Making Document dealing with the amendments to CPR PD 3E has yet to be published.
As we all know costs budgeting was the subject of a consultation process last year to look at the exemptions in place. All practitioners will need to be aware of the changes which are coming into force on 22 April 2014 as they will now encompass more cases then under the previous exemption regime.
The new rules for costs budgeting are currently in draft and still require approval of the Lord Chancellor and Parliament therefore could be subject to change when laid before Parliament for approval. Below we set out the new provisions and the implications for practitioners.
This rule is to be amended such that it will only apply to Part 7 claims. In relation to exemptions, following the costs budget consultations, the existing exemptions are to be removed and replaced with a much more workable blanket exemption such that costs budgeting will NOT apply to cases with a value of £10 million unless the parties agree to its application or the court orders otherwise. The court therefore retains a discretion to order costs budgeting to apply to a case.
The value of £10 million will be determined either by reference to the amount of the money claimed as stated in the claim form or, if the claim is not quantified, it will be taken from the statement of truth in the claim form that the claim is valued at £10 million or over.
This rule remains unchanged. There have been a number of cases which have grappled with how this rule should be construed such as
The position now, given that costs budgeting will not apply to Part 8 claims, must be that the provision in the rule which states that if no date is specified by the court the costs budgets must be filed and exchanged seven days before the first case management conference must be taken as being the default position. Therefore for practitioners who are dealing with a case in which the court has not given a date for filing and exchange it is important to determine the seven day period. Note: this is seven clear days (CPR 2.8(2)).
No amendment to this provision dealing with sanctions for failing to file a costs budget.
The existing provision simply states that the court may at any time make ‘costs management order’. However, the new provision will put the onus on the court to make such an order where costs budgets have been filed and exchanged. An order will not be made if essentially the court is satisfied that one is not required. For this to be the case, the litigation will need to be capable of being conducted in accordance with the overriding objective, ie for it to be just and proportionate, without the need for a CMO.
The court’s recording of comments within the CMO together with the court‘s control of the costs budgets will remain the same as the current CPR 3.15 provisions.
Are costs budgets required? There will be a number of changes to the practice direction. Of particular note are:
The budget format provisions will remain the same. For convenience we provide both the long and short form (under £25,000 claim value).
The statement of truth will be updated for 22 April 2014. It will read:
This budget is a fair and accurate statement of incurred and estimated costs which it would be reasonable and proportionate for my client to incur in this litigation.
This new statement of truth is set out in the 69th Update - practice direction amendments within the new Precedent H form which is to be substituted into CPR PD 3E.
Under the new provisions CMOs will generally be made. However, the remaining provisions in CPR PD 3E, para 2.2 - 2.9 will be retained.
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial. See our full terms here.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234