Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
Find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice with Lexis PSL
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
In his President’s Message of September 2014, Elliott Geisinger, President of the Swiss Arbitration Association (ASA) stated his concerns about the ethical guidance published recently by both the IBA (Guidelines on Party Representation in International Arbitration) and the LCIA (General Guidelines for the Parties’ Legal Representatives)*.
In short, his main concerns were:
Taking these concerns (in of course much greater detail than I have set out) into account, Geisinger has issued a call to action for the creation of a ‘truly transnational body to apply and enforce ethical principles’. The proposal is:
In parallel with creation of the committee, Geisinger propose a creation of a set of ‘core principles’ for counsel conduct drafted jointly by the institutions. He is clear that this would not be just another set of rules, this would be a truly joint global project with principles common to all parts of the arbitration community enshrined in the rules. He anticipates the core principles being only 1-2 pages long and potentially being similar to the LCIA Annex. The principles would work alongside statutory or other rules that apply to counsel by virtue of their bar admission.
Geisinger acknowledges the ambition of this project and that similar projects have been launched and failed. However, given the current debate and focus on ethics in the arbitration community, he feels that the time may be ripe for a project of this nature.
While Mr Geisinger is to be applauded for having ambition and drive to improve the practice and image of international arbitration some obvious concerns spring to mind:
And what do those outside our community think? Arbitration, particularly involving states, is becoming more well-known and scrutinised outside of the arbitration/legal world. There is a real fear that if we do not regulate ourselves others who know less about our ‘world’ will try to do so (an uncomfortable thought for those who engage with this topic academically and with good intentions, let alone for those who tread a fine ethical tightrope). In my, humble, opinion Geisinger’s proposals are laudable and well-meaning but too theoretical to have any real substance at this stage and fail to address all of its own concerns about the IBA and LCIA codes already in the market. While ethics in arbitration is a practical problem and not just an academic debate, these initiatives ought to be appraised and supported but whether this is the one that will really take hold, we will have to wait and see but I fear that the ‘waiting’ may be the undoing of this initiative.
*LexisPSL Arbitration subscribers can find content here on the IBA and LCIA rules.
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
**Trials are provided to all LexisPSL and LexisLibrary content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial. See our full terms here.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234