The cost of Coventry v Lawrence

The cost of Coventry v Lawrence

Handed down yesterday, it is the case that everyone is talking about.  The Supreme Court held that that the pre-2013 system of recovering success fees and after the event (ATE) insurance premiums from the losing party is compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).  This is important not just for those still pursuing cases under the pre-2013 position but also those still subject to the transitional arrangements where the new rules have yet to be applied, for example insolvency cases.

So what is the significance of the Supreme Court’s decision?

In a detailed and informative analysis David Bowden, freelance independent consultant, examines the judgment and talks to Alex Bagnall, associate and costs advocate of Just Costs, as well getting reaction from Mr Coventry and his solicitor Joanne Pooley, partner of Pooley Bendall & Watson.

Available to LexisPSL subscribers here, or access after taking a free trial here.

Subscription Form

Related Articles:
Latest Articles:

Already a subscriber? Login
RELX (UK) Limited, trading as LexisNexis, and our LexisNexis Legal & Professional group companies will contact you to confirm your email address. You can manage your communication preferences via our Preference Centre. You can learn more about how we handle your personal data and your rights by reviewing our  Privacy Policy.

Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.

Read full article

Already a subscriber? Login