Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
Supreme Court has dismissed the appellants’ appeal in Thevarajah v Riordan & others in a highly anticipated decision on the hot topic of relief from sanctions.
The Supreme Court upheld the Court of Appeal’s restoration of a debarring order made following the appellants’ non-compliance
with an order requiring disclosure under a freezing order.
In doing so, the Supreme Court has found that, to succeed on a ‘second’ application for relief against sanctions under CPR 3.9, the applicant will need to discharge or vary the 'first' relief from sanctions decision under CPR 3.1(7). Here,
subsequent compliance with the freezing order disclosure requirement did not constitute the ‘material change of circumstances’ required under Tibbles.
For our deeper analysis of this decision and some practical implications arising from it, LexisPSL Dispute Resolution subscribers can see our analysis Supreme Court upholds debarring order for failure to comply with freezing order disclosure (Thevarajah v Riordan & others). Click here to take a free trial to access the analysis.
0330 161 1234