Supreme Court, Human Rights and litigation costs

Supreme Court, Human Rights and litigation costs

supremecourtMany will remember the recent Supreme Court decision in Coventry, a case in which a nuisance was valued at £74,000 and yet costs of over £1 million had been incurred. On the issue of costs, a costs challenge was made on the basis of art 6 and the right to a fair trial. The Supreme Court did not reach a decision as to whether the old costs regime breached the right to a fair trial (art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and/or art 1 of the First Protocol of the Convention (A1P1)), instead the matter was adjourned to provide the Government with an opportunity to comment. The Supreme Court had suggested that the matter should then go before the Court of Appeal, it being the experienced appeal court in so far as dealing with costs issues was concerned.

However, the matter has just been listed to come back before the Supreme Court early next year; 9 – 11 February 2015. While many think that the appeal will be unsuccessful, a successful appeal could have seismic repercussions for the litigation costs landscape.

For PSL DR subscribers, a detailed analysis of the Supreme Court from July this year is accessible here.

Subscription Form

Related Articles:
Latest Articles:

Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.

Read full article

Already a subscriber? Login

About the author:

Janna is a dispute resolution lawyer. She deals primarily with cross border issues and is active in the work being undertaken in relation to the implications of Brexit for Dispute Resolutions lawyers. Janna also heads up a LexisNexis costs team bringing together expertise from across the company to deal with the costs issues facing the profession.