Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
Find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice with Lexis PSL
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
will remember the recent Supreme Court decision in Coventry, a case in which
a nuisance was valued at £74,000 and yet costs of over £1 million had been incurred. On the issue of costs, a costs challenge was made on the basis of art 6 and the right to a fair trial. The Supreme Court did not reach a decision as to
whether the old costs regime breached the right to a fair trial (art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and/or art 1 of the First Protocol of the Convention (A1P1)), instead the matter was adjourned to provide the Government with an opportunity
to comment. The Supreme Court had suggested that the matter should then go before the Court of Appeal, it being the experienced appeal court in so far as dealing with costs issues was concerned.
However, the matter has just been listed to come back before the Supreme Court early next year; 9 – 11 February 2015. While many think that the appeal will be unsuccessful, a successful appeal could have seismic repercussions for the litigation
For PSL DR subscribers, a detailed analysis of the Supreme Court from July this year is accessible here.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Janna is a dispute resolution lawyer. She deals primarily with cross border issues and is active in the work being undertaken in relation to the implications of Brexit for Dispute Resolutions lawyers. Janna also heads up a LexisNexis costs team bringing together expertise from across the company to deal with the costs issues facing the profession.
0330 161 1234