Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
We are all aware of the recent spate of high profile cases arising out of banking fraud proceedings in which committal orders have been made for breach of freezing orders.
However, what impact do these orders have where the contemnor refuses to attend court preferring to stay hidden out of view in other jurisdictions – think Ablyazov who was recently tracked down in France.
The Court of Appeal has recently been seen to take a firm stand against those that seek to flout court orders in Thursfield v Thursfield  EWCA Civ 840. As Jackson LJ stated ‘It is repugnant to the proper administration of justice that a contemnor can flout orders of the court then absent himself from the committal hearing, then avoid serving whatever prison sentence is imposed and then finally avail himself of the procedures of the Court of Appeal whilst enjoying the shelter of some safe haven overseas'.
The Court of Appeal has called for reform in this area so as to implement a permission requirement where the contemnor has refused to submit to the jurisdiction of the court; at present the contemnor can appeal as of right without the need to obtain permission first.
We are interested to hear your views on this. What do you think?
0330 161 1234