Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Following on from last week's publication of rule changes to the CPR, amendments to the CPR Practice Directions have now been published.
One such amendment relates to changes to Precedent H. From 1 September 2013 a substituted and amended Precedent H will be introduced and readers are reminded that they should ensure that they use an up to date version of Precedent H. These amendments are relatively minor but seek to address issues raised by users over the past 4 months since its introduction.
Since the introduction of costs budgeting and precedent H there has been much speculation as to whether the current exemptions will continue and to what extent current issues users have with the form would be exacerbated if it were to apply to cases in the Commercial Court or those over £2 million in other courts which are currently excluded (see our piece on that consultation here).
With these forthcoming amendments in mind, we thought it would be interesting to see the types of issues users are having with the form and whether the negative concerns surrounding it still apply since it has become a central aspect of litigation costs management.
LexisPSL subscribers should note that an interactive precedent H is available. If you are not a subscriber, please click here to find out more and to access a free trial.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Virginia specialises in general domestic and international commercial litigation, arbitration and alternative dispute resolution.
Virginia trained, qualified and practiced with Pinsent Masons before moving to Marriott Harrison where she continued in practice for a further seven years.
In practice, Virginia acted in a variety of general commercial disputes covering areas including intellectual property, fraud, defamation, misrepresentation, breach of contract, debt recovery, breach of restrictive covenants and company and shareholders’ disputes.
Virginia is Head of Dispute Resolution at Lexis®PSL and, when not focused on the strategic development and operational requirements of the Dispute Resolution module, her content work focuses on case management and evidence in civil litigation. She also regularly contributes to the LexisNexis Dispute Resolution Blog.
0330 161 1234