Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
The Court of Appeal in Dechert LLP v Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation Ltd  EWCA Civ 375 has dismissed an appeal and upheld a decision that a detailed assessment of client-solicitor costs under section 70 of the Solicitors Act 1974 (SA 1974) be held in private under CPR 39.2(3). In doing so, it found that, in the circumstances of this case, protecting ENRC’s fundamental right to legal professional privilege (LPP) outweighed the fundamental general principle of open justice.
It also found ENRC’s waiver of privilege in relation to these taxation proceedings had been for a limited purpose only. This case is of particular interest to practitioners in its consideration of the extent to which privilege is waived by a client
bringing proceedings against their former solicitors (whether they be costs assessment or professional negligence proceedings) and for its discussion of the distinction between waived and lost privilege.
ENRC had applied for a detailed costs assessment of Dechert's bill of costs to be held in private under CPR 39.2(3). Initially, the application had been dismissed by a Master but was subsequently allowed by Roth J on appeal. This judgment is of the further
appeal in which Dechert sought to overturn Roth J's decision that the detailed costs assessment be heard in private.
For a detailed analysis of the parties’ arguments and the judges’ findings in this decision, see link at the end of this article.
In dismissing the appeal and upholding Roth J's decision that the taxation be heard in private, the Court of Appeal considered the following key issues:
Lady Justice Gloster 'had no difficulty in concluding that the judge's conclusion, namely that these proceedings should be heard in private, was correct' (para ) and found, among other things:
Lady Justice Gloster found 'the authorities clearly demonstrate that there is a concept of waiver for limited purposes and that this is clearly what happened in this case'. More particularly:
Lexis®PSL Dispute Resolution subscribers enjoy a wealth of more expert analysis:
Click here for a free trial to access if you are not a PSL subscriber.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Virginia specialises in general domestic and international commercial litigation, arbitration and alternative dispute resolution.
Virginia trained, qualified and practiced with Pinsent Masons before moving to Marriott Harrison where she continued in practice for a further seven years.
In practice, Virginia acted in a variety of general commercial disputes covering areas including intellectual property, fraud, defamation, misrepresentation, breach of contract, debt recovery, breach of restrictive covenants and company and shareholders’ disputes.
Virginia is Head of Dispute Resolution at Lexis®PSL and, when not focused on the strategic development and operational requirements of the Dispute Resolution module, her content work focuses on case management and evidence in civil litigation. She also regularly contributes to the LexisNexis Dispute Resolution Blog.
0330 161 1234