Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
We reported last month on the so called 'Plebgate' case which is fast becoming a landmark costs management case. At the High Court, Andrew Mitchell MP's lawyer failed to file a costs budget and he therefore saw the cost of his libel action against The Sun restricted to the cost of the court fees for the claim.
The Court of Appeal is now set to hear the case, at an as yet unspecified date. Mr Justice MacDuff made the order to leapfrog the appeal against Master McCloud's decision regarding implementation of Lord Justice Jackson's costs regime.
The outcome of the appeal may well only be of limited assistance if the appeal focuses on the pilot scheme under which this case was proceeding. Of far more interest will be the senior judiciary's approach to the application of the new provisions in CPR3.9, namely relief from sanctions. This will be a test for their support for the new much tougher stance on non-compliance with the CPR.
This case will be heard by the Lord Justices appointed by Lord Dyson to hear Jackson appeals; those being Lord Dyson (Master of the Rolls), Lord Justice Jackson himself, Lord Justice Stephen Richards (the deputy head of civil justice), and Lord Justices Davis and Lewison.
Subscribers of LexisPSL can access our full report here. If you are not a subscriber, please click here to find out more and to access a free trial.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234