Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
Find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice with Lexis PSL
Check out our straightforward definitions of common legal terms.
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Access our unrivalled global news content, business information and analytics solutions
Insurance, risk and compliance intelligence using big data, proprietary linking and advanced analytics.
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
introduction of MedCo in April 2015 was designed to address concerns around the independence and quality of medical reports in road traffic accident claims and to assist the prevention of fraudulent claims. It also aimed to break any real or
perceived financial links between commissioners of reports and experts.
Any appropriately accredited Medical Reporting Organisation (MROs) or qualified medical professional could register with MedCo. From 1 January 2016, under the MedCo accreditation arrangements, it was a requirement for medical experts to complete their
training before 6 April 2016 in order to diagnose soft tissue injuries. However, this scheme for reducing whiplash fraud has suffered a setback with delays of up to three months. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) announced that it has extended the accreditation
deadline for medical practitioners signing up to the MedCo scheme.
This hindrance developed in March, when medical experts that had not completed their full accreditation, were asked to start their training again as MedCo had changed its provider. MedCo decided four weeks before the original deadline of 6 April 2016,
that it ‘made the difficult decision to bring accreditation training in-house’. They stated that the ‘speed and flexibility required to be able to update the accreditation training as necessary in order to ensure a current, robust,
resilient and consistent programme’. As of this, accreditation training would now only be available from MedCo.
With these changes, a real concern was centred around the tightness of the deadline, with only 132 experts accredited less than a month before the deadline, the government realised that potentially there could be a major shortage of experts to diagnose
soft tissue injuries. Additionally, if these issues were not resolved, then questions would be raised about top tier providers. The lack of experts accredited would mean that these providers would find it difficult to retain their statuses as their
requirement is to have at least 250 accredited specialists, thus posing a flaw to the system.
It was therefore decided by the Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson, to move the deadline from 6 April 2016 to 1 June 2016 causing a further delay in the system.
The main purpose of MedCo was to ensure that experts had no financial links to the lawyers instructing them. However, the biggest criticism this new system faces is the limitation of claimant choice. Reports suggest that some MROs were cheating their
way through this system, and registering as multiple entities to ensure market share.
The MoJ now proposes new procedures to stop the creation of ‘shell’ MROs whilst at the same time giving a greater choice of MROs to claimants. The review by MoJ reveals that there will be an increase in the search results for ‘tier 1’
MRO, giving more choice to the claimant.
At present, claimants can choose between one tier 1 and six tier 2 MROs; this is to change to two and ten respectively. Changes will also be made to the MRO qualifying criteria in an aim to remove ‘shell’ companies registering more than once
to increase their chances on selection.
Other new proposals from the MoJ review are set to come into effect, summer 2016. These include:
These further delays and a change in the accreditation training give a chance to the critics to attack the system. It aids them with additional reasons as to why the introduction of MedCo is more complicated than planned.
Nevertheless, despite the criticism, the MoJ has put forward a rational to do list to make advancements in the interests of justice. Hopefully the government have realised a better method to keep tabs on training procedures and are happy to implement
them to improve the system in the long run. If so then a few hiccups along the way can probably be justified.
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
0330 161 1234