Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Will recent changes to Russia’s litigation system improve the perception of Russian courts on the global stage? Timur Aitkulov, partner at Clifford Chance’s Moscow office specialising in international arbitration, cross-border and domestic litigation, explains the key reforms of recent years and assesses their likely impact in practice.
It is no secret that the Russian court system has not been considered to be reliable in the last 20 years or more.
One of the directions of reform was concerning the transparency of justice. This has been addressed by the introduction of a website where one can find information on all cases that come under the consideration of Arbitrazh Courts. It is also possible to download copies of court decisions, thereby making the system considerably more transparent.
Another direction was regarding the unification of the Arbitrazh Courts’ approach to the application of law. The presidium of the Supreme Arbitrazh Court was therefore authorised to issue decrees clarifying how the law shall be applied, and these decrees became binding on lower courts in similar cases. There have been instances where these decrees have been quite revolutionary.
The separate Judicial Board for Economic Disputes will basically replace the Presidium of the Supreme Arbitrazh Court. However, since the majority of judges who will be sitting on the Judicial Board for Economic Disputes are current Supreme Arbitrazh Court judges, I do not expect any major changes in their approach to cases.
However, it is worth noting that it is likely that only the Plenum of the Supreme Court will be entitled to give clarifications on the application of law binding on lower courts in similar cases. Also, decisions of the Judicial Board for Economic Disputes will be subject to further supervisory appeal to the Presidium of the Supreme Court.
The proposed amendments to the Arbitrazh Procedure Code are still in a draft form. One of the major changes contemplated by the draft is a two-stage cassation appeal process. First-stage cassation appeals will be filed with the District Arbitrazh Courts (currently called Federal District Arbitrazh Courts), and the second-stage cassation appeal will be filed with the Judicial Board for Economic Disputes. The Presidium of the Supreme Court will hear supervisory appeals against decisions of the Judicial Board for Economic Disputes.
It is too early to say how this reform will play out, but I am hopeful that it will help in terms of increasing the predictability of judgments.
To what extent are these reforms likely to improve the global perception of Russian courts?
I do not think that any changes in law will change the perception of Russian courts internationally—it is to a large extent not about what the law says, but whether or not it is complied with, regardless of the size of the dispute and the identity of the opposite party.
Timur Aitkulov is a partner at Clifford Chance’s Moscow office specialising in international arbitration, cross-border and domestic litigation
Interviewed by Jenny Rayner. The views expressed by our Legal Analysis interviewees are not necessarily those of the proprietor.
First published on Lexis®PSL Dispute Resolution. Click here for a free one week trial of Lexis®PSL
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial. See our full terms here.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234