Life as a construction barrister (series - part 2)

In the second of a series looking at construction lawyers, Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC of Atkin Chambers explains how construction disputes have changed over the past few years and what to expect in the future.

What is your favourite thing about being a construction barrister?

It’s great being involved in a field that is not just about disputes, but which also involves the creation of something. I don’t mean creative arguments, but rather the projects which are the subject matter of cases. In the commercial field, the law can sometimes be somewhat intangible or removed from reality. In construction disputes the reality of the physical project and the people involved in the project is never far removed. This, combined with the genuinely interesting legal issues that many construction disputes throw up, is what makes my work interesting. The fact that most projects involve a number of different professionals, several contractors, funders, insurers as well as the employer, gives rise to complex questions of legal responsibility when something goes wrong.

What is the most memorable case you have been instructed on during your career?

A large number of my cases are in arbitration and so are confidential. The case which attracted the most media coverage was probably the Wembley litigation where I represented Mott MacDonald—Brookfield Construction (UK) Ltd (formerly Multiplex Constructions (UK) Ltd v Mott Macdonald Ltd [2010] EWHC 659 (TCC), [2010] All ER (D) 13 (Apr).

It was said at the time to be the largest professional negligence case issued in the Technology and Construction Court (TCC). In terms of case management, this case was ahead of its time. The other side’s incurred costs were very high which was tricky. At the time the TCC’s case management powers related primarily to costs to be incurred, but I persuaded the TCC to make some extremely helpful and robust comments concerning the very high level of costs already incurred. On a lighter note, the site visit to Wembley Stadium (minus the usual crowds) was certainly fun.

Have you noticed any trends in the cases you’ve been instructed on over the last few years?

Trends in the dispute side of the construction industry tend, not surprisingly, to follow what is being built. On the domestic side, the last few years have seen a number of wind farm disputes both offshore and onshore. These have covered a range of issues from planning to fairly traditional delay and disruption claims to more specific claims relating to the design and construction of the wind turbines.By contrast, on the international side, the projects are much more varied, but there has been an increase in parties raising allegations of fraud, fraudulent misrepresentation and deceit, whether as a basis of a claim being advanced or in defence to a claim.

Has there been any development (or lack of development) in construction law in recent years that concerns you?

Construction cases historically generated many of the leading cases, concerning for example the law of contract, negligence, and damages. The success of adjudication in the domestic market has taken a large number of disputes out of the courts and so over the last 15 or more years we have seen fewer appellate cases developing construction law. This is particularly noticeable in relation to the New Engineering Contract (NEC) standard form contract. The lack of authority ultimately results in an increased risk for clients and makes advising more difficult for lawyers.

More recently there has been a noticeable upturn in cases being fought through the courts. The Court of Appeal decision in Robinson v PE Jones (Contractors) Ltd [2011] [2011] EWCA Civ 9, [2011] All ER (D) 111 (Jan) is a good example of the importance of generating case law. The Court of Appeal concluded the builder did not, by reason of his contract to construct or complete the building, assume any liability in the tort of negligence in relation to defects giving rise to purely economic loss. What remains less clear is when a concurrent duty will arise in the construction field, or when the facts will satisfy a Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd [1964] AC 465, [1963] 2 All ER 575 assumption of responsibility. We really need a Supreme Court decision on this.

If you could change one thing about construction law or the litigation process, what would it be?

I have two main issues:

  • although probably unrealistic, it would be of real benefit to clients if it could be made easier to enforce judgments overseas—this remains the real advantage that arbitral awards have over court judgments
  • I would encourage clients to pick up the phone to their lawyers earlier in the dispute process—often important decisions are made while the project is still ongoing and a short phone call or email exchange could significantly improve a client’s position

What impact do you think the (apparently) recovering economy/construction industry will have on the type of cases you are instructed on over the next 12–18 months?

In contrast to earlier economic downturns, the 2008 economic difficulties did not generate any substantial increase in construction litigation or arbitration, at least not domestically. The improvement in the economy is likely to result in a greater appetite for fighting cases. This has already been seen in other jurisdictions such as Dubai.

What advice would you give to solicitors who instruct you to help get the best out of each other?

I’m pretty fortunate with the solicitors who instruct me. We tend to work together as a team. In construction, like any industry, it is ultimately important to understand your client’s interests and concerns. Solicitors continue to have a much closer relationship with clients than the bar and as such it is important they do not take for granted the need to keep the barrister informed about the client’s goals and concerns.

Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC is a barrister at Atkin Chambers.

The views expressed by our Legal Analysis interviewees are not necessarily those of the proprietor.

First published on LexisNexis Purpose Built blog and  LexisPSL ConstructionClick here for a free one week trial.

Read part one here

Relevant Articles
Area of Interest