Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
what is hopefully a move towards greater transparency across all institutions, the LCIA has recently revealed two sources of data about its costs and about how its tribunals reach decisions on costs.
The London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) itself recently released data on the costs and duration of arbitrations. Its
comparisons to costs under other institutions has the potential to have ruffled a few feathers (as a general pattern the LCIA data shows that costs in International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) and Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) arbitration
would be more expensive but arbitration under Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) would be slightly less expensive).
In respect of costs the data showed that:
Clearly this only covers the LCIA's arbitration costs, not the parties’ other costs.
The LCIA has also provided data to the ICC Commission which reported on Decisions on Costs in International Arbitration.
In its submissions to the ICC, the LCIA examined 46 awards from 2012 from which:
The LCIA also examined 46 awards from 2013, which showed that:
the respondent prevailed in 11 cases, in 10 of these, the claimant was ordered to pay all of the costs of the arbitration and some or all of the respondent's legal costs
in only two cases, each party was ordered to pay its own legal costs. In one case, this was ordered following an agreement between the parties
the costs of the arbitration were split equally in six cases and in proportion to success in six cases
Using a very unscientific analysis, these figures would tend to show that parties to LCIA arbitration will pay less in administration fees than at other comparable institutions and, on the whole, over 70% of successful parties (which a claiming party
will generally be in some or all respects) will recover some or all of their costs.
Without comparable data from other institutions we cannot draw any concrete comparisons from this data, but, one could suggest that the release of this information has done the LCIA no harm in terms of being a claiming party’s institution of choice.
0330 161 1234