Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
How much of an impact have the Jackson reforms made to your life in practice? Have you spent considerable time and CPD points trying to understand the new provisions themselves as well as how the costs specific new provisions are supposed to work alongside the new case management provisions?
If so, you may have read with eagerness (or growing dread) that Mr Justice Ramsey, within 6 months of the reforms coming into force, has already been quoted as saying that as the judge in charge of implementing the reforms, the reforms are facing a review. He will be joined by District Judge Christopher Lethem and Mr Justice Stewart.
The judiciary would appear to have taken a united approach in applying stricter interpretations to the CPR provisions and this is extremely likely to be supported by the Court of Appeal as and when any cases dealing with the reforms are heard by it. The first one is likely to be that in Mitchell v NGN which involves a leap frog appeal from the decision of Master McCloud and looks not just at costs budgeting but also the new provisions in CPR 3.9 for relief from sanctions.
As we come to terms with that approach should we not be given the opportunity, after so much upheaval in recent years in trying to get to grips with the new rules, to allow the new rules a chance to bed down and for us to come to terms with them or is it better to look at them just six months after implementation?
It will be interesting to see what other areas will be subject to Mr Justice Ramsey’s review. It would appear that they will more limited in scope than perhaps some commentators have suggested, such that they consider the recommendations in Jackson final costs report which were not implemented. If such recommendations are subsequently implemented this may require some changes to the existing rules or even new legislation but is probably not going to result in extreme changes to the April 2013 provisions already in place. Examples of the issues which maybe under consideration are pre-action costs and case management.
What do you think? Vote in our poll below (or leave us a comment).
0330 161 1234