Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
IBA Subcommittee on Investment Treaty Arbitration (the Subcommittee) has published a report following the Subcommittee’s survey on investment treaty arbitration (ITA). The report arises out of a decision made by the Subcommittee
in 2014 to engage with the perceived increase in criticism of ITA and consider whether or not such criticism was justified and reform required as a result.
Indeed, since 2014, the level of public criticism of certain aspects of ITA has increased, particularly in light of the ongoing negotiations regarding the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). It is also worth noting that
since the Subcommittee's survey was released in July 2016, the European Commission has proposed the use of an investment court to resolve disputes arising out of TTIP so as to address some of the concerns raised in relation to TTIP's investment chapter.
The Subcommittee released a survey questionnaire of 51 questions and 109 individuals from a variety of jurisdictions responded. The report recognises that a response base of 109 participants does not constitute a critical mass for statistical purposes.
The largest respondent groups were counsel and academics. 80% of respondents had experience of ICSID arbitration; 70% had UNCITRAL arbitration experience.
Despite the relatively small number of respondents, the results of the survey provide an interesting insight into many of the key contemporary issues in ITA. While it is helpful to understand the percentage of respondents who expressed concerns regarding
particular matters, understanding the views behind the votes would also be useful.
Overall, while concerns are expressed regarding aspects of ITA, such as substantive inconsistency and arbitrator diversity, some areas, such as the adequacy of the grounds for annulment of ICSID awards, were thought not to require reform.
Access the report here
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial. See our full terms here.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Barry specialises in international arbitration and commercial litigation. He trained and practised at Jones Day before joining Pinsent Masons. At LexisNexis, Barry is Head of Arbitration and Head of the Lexis®PSL Dispute Resolution Group.
In practice, Barry’s work included commercial, aviation and technology arbitrations pursuant to international arbitral rules, involving UK and international clients. He also has a background in general commercial, civil fraud and IT litigation, including experience before the High Court. While in private practice, Barry worked with a broad range of clients from the private and public sectors.
At LexisNexis, when not focused on the strategic development and operational requirements of the Dispute Resolution Group, Barry’s content work focuses on the law and practice of international commercial arbitration and investment treaty arbitration. In addition to his work for Lexis®PSL, Barry contributes to the LexisNexis Dispute Resolution Blog and New Law Journal on litigation and arbitration matters
0330 161 1234