Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
Find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice with Lexis PSL
Check out our straightforward definitions of common legal terms.
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Access our unrivalled global news content, business information and analytics solutions
Insurance, risk and compliance intelligence using big data, proprietary linking and advanced analytics.
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Further to our recent post regarding the MOJ pressing ahead with increase to court fees, Gordon Exall, barrister at Zenith Chambers and author of Munkman on Damages for Personal Injuries and Death, considers the impact of the proposed increases.
The thinking is quite explicit. The court service, and court fees, are now to be a way of raising money for the Exchequer. This was set out in the (in my opinion, wholly inadequate and poorly researched) impact assessment. The income generated through fees in the civil courts now broadly covers the full costs of the service:
‘The policy of setting some fees above costs (“enhanced fees”) aims to contribute to the HMCTS’ financial position.’
The plans are to greatly increase court fees across all areas:
All litigants will be affected. Responses from the judges state that it is particularly small and medium sized enterprises that will have difficulty in litigating. In effect this increase undoes some of the work of the Jackson reforms. The increases make litigation less affordable. It will have a major impact on those enterprises that regularly have to issue proceedings to enforce payments of invoices.
There is no doubt that there is now a battle to determine litigation forums, with some judges recently taking up work in Singapore. I suspect that court fees will play a part in this. The key thing to note is that someone in Singapore is obviously awake to the need to make the courts attractive to litigants. This is in the context of an enterprise culture. On the other hand, someone in London is using court fees to stifle enterprise. If this carries on there will only be one conclusion.
Issuing and litigating is now an even more expensive business. The costs of litigation must be explained and considered in even more detail.
I have always been a sceptic in relation to point three. However, it is clear that the people making decisions about these issues either have no idea at all of what they are doing, and the impact of their acts, or they are hostile to the very concept of litigation taking place.
Litigation is the means by which a civilised society sorts out its disputes. These fee increases make it harder for large tranches of society to participate in litigation. They may now have to find alternative means of obtaining justice. The whole episode is shameful.
Interviewed by Evelyn Reid.
The views expressed by our Legal Analysis interviewees are not necessarily those of the proprietor.
First published on LexisPSL Dispute Resolution. Click here for a free trial.
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
0330 161 1234