Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
The Commercial Court, Queen’s Bench Division has allowed an application challenging the withholding of inspection of certain categories of documents on the grounds of litigation privilege (Starbev GP Ltd v Interbrew Central European Holding BV  All ER (D) 116 (Jan),  EWHC 4038 (Comm)).
In doing so, it considered the ‘withholding’ party had not satisfied the burden of proof in establishing reasonably contemplated or anticipated litigation as the dominant purpose of the relevant categories of documents over which privilege was sought (applying West London Pipeline).
This judgment serves as a useful reminder on the law on litigation privilege; of the difficulties in protecting pre-action documents from inspection; and of the detailed consideration the courts will give the evidence in support of an application asserting litigation privilege (Tchenguiz and West London Pipeline).
This judgment is a useful reminder of the legal principles of litigation privilege. Put very simply, the party seeking to rely on litigation privilege (and on whom the burden of proof lies) must persuade the court that those documents or categories of documents were created for the dominant purpose of seeking and/or obtaining advice and/or evidence or information in relation to contemplated or anticipated litigation and that such anticipated litigation was 'real' as opposed to a mere possibility or a general apprehension of future litigation. (See paragraph 11 of the judgment for further details on the principles and key authorities on litigation privilege.)
This application is also a further reminder of the difficulties in seeking to protect disclosable pre-action documents from inspection during any subsequent proceedings. It gives rise to a number of practical tips, including:
This article was first published on Lexis®PSL Dispute Resolution on 24 January 2014. Click here for a free 24 trial of Lexis®PSL.
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial. See our full terms here.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Virginia specialises in general domestic and international commercial litigation, arbitration and alternative dispute resolution.
Virginia trained, qualified and practiced with Pinsent Masons before moving to Marriott Harrison where she continued in practice for a further seven years.
In practice, Virginia acted in a variety of general commercial disputes covering areas including intellectual property, fraud, defamation, misrepresentation, breach of contract, debt recovery, breach of restrictive covenants and company and shareholders’ disputes.
Virginia is Head of Dispute Resolution at Lexis®PSL and, when not focused on the strategic development and operational requirements of the Dispute Resolution module, her content work focuses on case management and evidence in civil litigation. She also regularly contributes to the LexisNexis Dispute Resolution Blog.
0330 161 1234