Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
Find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice with Lexis PSL
Check out our straightforward definitions of common legal terms.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter.
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Access our unrivalled global news content, business information and analytics solutions
Insurance, risk and compliance intelligence using big data, proprietary linking and advanced analytics.
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Our latest thinking on key legal industry developments
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
In advance on the ICC/YAF Seminar ‘paper, paper everywhere…..’ we would like to collate your views on this hot topic.
This is a much-heard complaint in international arbitration – submissions are too long, witness statements are too long and don’t focus on the crux of the case, disclosure is getting out of hand, parties focus on quantity not quality in order to ‘flood’ their opponent etc etc.
But is it true?
Is the volume of ‘paper’ (physical or electronic) any worse than in previous decades?
Is it an unavoidable facet of modern dispute resolution? Is the volume justifiable in the name of reaching the right outcome and, ultimately (and hopefully!) justice?
Does the volume of paper in arbitration need reigning-back with Jackson-style regulation?
Please vote in our poll and add your comments to the debate:
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
0330 161 1234