Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
To coincide with the implementation of the Jackson Review of Civil Litigation Costs, LexisNexis have published a one–off Cook on Costs 2013 Jackson Review Supplement in July 2013, discussing the reforms to the costs of litigation, including, but not limited to:
To give you a taste of the contents of this excellent supplement, we have been given access to chapter 7 on Proportionality.
The concept of proportionality is central to the reforms. Jackson saw his remit in his review of civil litigation costs was ‘to promote access to justice at proportionate costs’ (chapter 4, para 1.14 of the ‘review of civil lit costs: Final report'). A noble aim but one that brought with it the concerns of the legal community that the pursuit of justice has been qualified. “The answer in any given case is that this definition will lead to whatever the judge considering the check-list, in the context of the case before him/her, decides is proportionate with the parameters of a reasonable exercise of judicial discretion." (Cook on Costs 2013 Jackson Review Supplement, Chapter 7) This inevitably brings a concern that a more thorough investigation may be permitted in one court than in another.
Proportionality is central to the new costs management regime and the way in which the court will determine the budget; proportionality will ultimately determine a budget figure for each phase, although curiously, at the time of setting the budget, the identity of the paying party is unknown - will the court assume that when setting each budget figure that the party is the receiving party?
The chapter goes onto consider the reversal of Lownds and the court's new approach which should be to first make an assessment of reasonable costs and then decide if those costs are proportional. If they are not, they should be reduced as appropriate.
Case management and costs management go hand in hand and this chapter goes onto consider several areas which are directly impacted by proportionality, including allocation, use of standard direction templates, witnesses and witness statements, disclosure, experts, relief from sanctions, trial, assessment of costs and agreement of budgets and directions.
Rather than re-publish this chapter verbatim, please email us for your free chapter.
Click here for further details regarding the Cook on Costs 2013 Jackson Review Supplement which was published in July 2013. Click here for information on Cook on Costs 2014.
0330 161 1234