Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
Printer Friendly Version
Last Friday, 10 October, saw EU Ministers finally ratify the Choice of Convention 2005. It will now come into force 3 months after that date ie 10 October 2015. For the press release on the ratification, see here. For practitioners dealing with international disputes involving the EU, this is an important moment as both the Convention and Brussels I (recast), which will apply from the same date, deal with Choice of Court Agreements.
Note: For subscribers to LexisPSL assistance guidance is provided on both the Convention and article 25 of Brussels I (recast)
For those without such a subscription, we will, over the coming weeks be providing a series of insights into different issues which need to be considered when applying Brussels I (recast). Given the fact that the Convention comes into force at the same time, we will be bringing forward the blog on Choice of Court Agreements to this Thursday. This blog comprises a review produced by Patrick Robinson, a partner in the dispute resolution practice at Linklaters. He considers the amendments to the general rules on EU jurisdiction clauses and, among other things, points out the potential pitfalls—and how to avoid them—arising from the adoption of a new rule on substantive validity.
The series of blogs on Brussels I (recast) began with one on arbitration by Nigel Rawding, a partner at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP and head of the firm’s London-based international arbitration practice, and Liz Snodgrass, counsel in the firm’s international arbitration group based in London. In their review they highlight the likely effects and challenges the new regulation will pose for arbitration. Find that blog here.
Over the coming weeks we will be providing blogs on issues such as Reversing Gasser, the impact of the changes on enforcement as well as dealing with third party states.
Feel free to provide comments for inclusion following the blog. While your name is required to submit the comment, we can, if requested, publish the comment on to the blog on an anonymous basis, or, tweet to us @lexisuk_dr.
0330 161 1234