Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
Find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice with Lexis PSL
Check out our straightforward definitions of common legal terms.
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Access our unrivalled global news content, business information and analytics solutions
Insurance, risk and compliance intelligence using big data, proprietary linking and advanced analytics.
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Richard Norton, barrister at St John's Buildings, summarises the 8th edition of the Ogden Tables.
1. The 8th Edition of the Ogden Tables and explanatory notes were released on 17th July 2020 -
these will have an effect on calculating particularly future losses in higher value cases.
2. Expectations of life are lower than in the 7th Edition of the Tables. This is due to lower
decreases in mortality than previously projected between 2008 and 2018 and more
pessimistic assumptions from the ONS regarding the future rates of improvement of mortality
over the next few years. For younger Claimants the approximate reduction in life expectancy
is about 1 year for men and 2 years for women. This is higher for older Claimants - the
difference in predicted life expectancy can be as much as 8-9%. For example, the life
expectancy for a 25-year-old man was 61.76 years. It is now 60.90 years. For a 65-year-old
man it was 21.42 years. It is now 20.25 years. Notable female life multipliers have a greater
3. The new tables have columns at -0.75% and -0.25%. There are also new tables – multipliers
for loss of earnings to pension age 68 (Tables 11 and 12) and multipliers for loss of earnings
to pension age 80 (Tables 17 and 18). Similarly there are multipliers for loss of pension
commencing at age 68 (Tables 27 and 28) and for multipliers for loss of pension commencing
at age 80 (Tables 33 and 34). There are now 36 tables whereas there were 28. The discounting
factors for term certain and multipliers for pecuniary loss for term certain remain at Tables 35
4. Paragraph 12 is helpful in resisting applications for expert evidence on life expectancy – noting
that the Courts generally have been reluctant to admit expert evidence to argue for a different
life expectancy solely on the basis of lifestyle factors following Dodds v Arif and Aviva
Insurance  EWHC 1512.
5. The method of calculating contingencies other than mortality has changed:
(a) The definition of disability relies upon the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 rather
than the Equality Act 2010 - a more restrictive definition - this may be because a
higher percentage of the working population is now classed as disabled. This is
inanition to other requirements to be satisfied before a Claimant is classed as disabled
- see para 54 onwards;
(b) The calculation of higher educational qualifications is now put into Level 3, Level 2
and Level 1 rather than D, GE-A and O and the definition of the levels is contained at
paragraph 73 - this is because of the greater variation in the type of qualifications now
6. There is also a new section in the introduction addressing pension loss quantification – see
paragraph 111 onwards which should be very helpful to practitioners when
accountancy/actuarial evidence is not permitted by the Court.
7. The section addressing dependency claims resulting from fatal accidents/incidents
acknowledges Knauer v Ministry of Justice  UKSC 9 (paragraph 127) - calculating future
loss from the date of trial rather than the date of death. Also the discounting factors at Table
E (page 48 of the introductory notes) is expanded to take account of older ages - up to age 90.
Similarly, Table F (discounting factors for post-trial damages) is expanded to take account of
8. There is a new section E addressing periodical payments for loss of earnings. The usefulness
of this may depend on the outcome of Swift v Carpenter in part, as this is usually a useful head
of loss to ‘borrow from’ in order to fund accommodation.
9. The Ogden Working Party continue to recommend the involvement of actuaries in more
complicated cases. It may be difficult to persuade a Court that this type of expert evidence is
reasonably required pursuant to CPR 35.1 but the notes to the Tables do envisage this type of
evidence in such cases.
10. The editors have noted the possible effects of COVID-19 pandemic on future mortality – the
mortality projections do not include any allowance for the possible effects of this. What the
future holds in this respect is open to debate.
This blog post was first published on the website of St John's Buildings on 24th July 2020 and can be accessed here. It is reproduced with permission.
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
0330 161 1234