Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
Find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice with Lexis PSL
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Over the last 7 years BLP’s International Arbitration Group has conducted a number of surveys to obtain the views of users of international arbitration on issues affecting the arbitration process. Last year’s survey considered the issue of gender and ethnic diversity on tribunals (see: Diversity on arbitral tribunals—the BLP International Arbitration Survey 2016). This year’s topic is the unilateral appointment of arbitrators.
Should the system of party-appointed arbitrators be abolished and replaced with a system under which the supervising institution, or other body involved with making tribunal appointments, appoints all members of the tribunal? The replacement of party appointments with unilateral appointment arrangements has been mooted as a means of widening the pool of arbitrators and encouraging diversity, but the topic also raises countless questions to which there is no clear or obvious answer.
The survey seeks to canvas views across the arbitration community on some of these issues.
Many of the questions found in the survey are directed at the potential advantages/disadvantages associated with party appointments, which will be relevant to many arbitration practitioners.
Some questions also concern the role of arbitral institutions in making tribunal appointments. It is worth noting that while expressed as relating to institutional appointments, some of the questions are also relevant to circumstances where other bodies apart from arbitral institutions are involved in the appointment of tribunals.
All responses will be treated by BLP as confidential. A report and editorial on the results of the survey will be circulated by BLP.
Access the survey here.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234