Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Solicitors can charge any hourly rate they wish for their services but will they be able to recover those costs from the other side if, and when, their client wins the case? There are two hurdles which may prevent this. The first is costs budgeting in which the court may consider the hourly rates to be disproportionate to the matter and the second is the use of Guideline Hourly Rates (GHR). The GHRs are intended to assist judges in carrying out summary assessment but they are widely used as a starting point by the courts when determining the reasonableness of rates claimed on detailed assessment as well.
The GHRs used to be set by the Master of the Rolls but the Government announced on 31 October 2012 that this role would be transferred to the Civil Justice Council from January 2013. The CJC has set up a costs committee to do this and it has met a couple of times to discuss the way forward see: CJC costs committee first meeting and CJC costs committee second meeting.
Last week the committee announced that it would be making available a survey from Friday 1 November until Friday 29 November asking for feedback from practitioners on the use and impact of GHRs. The survey is seen by the committee as an important step in establishing new GHRs. The committee in announcing the survey stated that it:
‘wishes to encourage every law firm in England and Wales to respond to the questionnaire to ensure the evidence base is as comprehensive as possible, reflecting a wide range of factors concerning the costs of legal services up and down the country and at all levels of practitioner seniority.’
For further information click here.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Janna is a dispute resolution lawyer with a Masters in Construction Law and Dispute Resolution. During her time in private practice at both Herbert Smith and Denton Wilde Sapte (now Dentons) she worked on complex international disputes, both litigation and LMAA arbitrations, dealing with technical cross border issues.
Janna deals primarily with cross border issues and is active in the work being undertaken in relation to the implications of Brexit for Dispute Resolutions lawyers. She also heads up a LexisNexis costs team bringing together expertise from across the company to deal with the costs issues facing the profession and was a contributing author for the Cook on Costs supplement dealing with the Jackson reforms. Janna is a frequent contributor to the legal and professional press, including the New Law Journal and Counsel magazine.
0330 161 1234