Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
With the pound impacted by Brexit fears and suffering from a 'flash crash', Peter Hirst and Catherine Reeves from Clyde & Co explore whether an award for, say, £100,000 million is worth the same this week as last week?
The fluctuation of currency is far from uncommon so what is the impact on any damages awarded in arbitration and the enforcement of those damages in such situations
Under English law, the tribunal may order the payment of a sum of money in any currency (Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996), s 48). (By way of interest, similarly in an arbitration under the Arbitration Rules of the London Court of International Arbitration
(LCIA) an award may be expressed in any currency unless the parties have agreed otherwise (Article 26)).
In Lesotho v Impreglio the court considered the application of AA 1996, s 48. In the case a tribunal had awarded the Italian contractor damages in various European currencies (including sterling) in respect of claims expressed in
Maloti (Lesotho’s currency). The award followed a substantial depreciation of Lesotho the currency between the time of the loss being suffered and the commencement of the arbitration. The award was challenged to the High Court, then the Court
of Appeal then to the House of Lords.
The House of Lords found that the tribunal's approach was the correct one and that the tribunal's power under AA 1996, s 48 was unconstrained. The position is therefore, essentially, that unless the contract expressly or impliedly excludes the tribunal
from awarding damages in a currency other than the currency of the contract, it may do so.
For a tribunal addressing issues of currency under English law, guidance is available in Virani v Manuel Revert that:
It is the case that the value of your award regardless of the currency it is made in is subject to the market value of that currency as at the time of enforcement. Note that while the tribunal may have provided for the currency in the award to address
the real loss, any delay between the award and enforcement may only be recognised by interest.
In most circumstances, enforcement can be challenging enough without worrying about the value of the currency of the award and the effect of market fluctuations upon it. The key therefore is to be conscious at the time of contracting as to the likely
currency of any arbitral award and, if appropriate, to provide for it in the arbitration agreement (though note that even 'safe' currencies fluctuate).
If, as in Lesotho, the currency of the contract is such that the value of any award in that currency would not fairly reflect the loss suffered then this is an issue to be pleaded to the tribunal. Clearly in an English-seated arbitration the tribunal
has a discretion to order damages in a currency other than the currency of the contract. It occurs to me that it would be unusual for a tribunal to do so but with a House of Lords precedent to rely upon they have solid grounds for so doing.
Lexis®PSL Arbitration subscribers enjoy a wealth of expert analysis. Click here for a free trial to access if you are not a PSL subscriber.
 Lesotho Highlands Development Authority v Impreglio SpA  UKHL 43
 Virani Ltd v Maunel Rivert y CIA SA [2—3] EWCA Civ 1651
0330 161 1234