Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
years into the Jackson costs reforms and we could be forgiven for thinking that the changes were bedding in and we could look forward to a period of relative calm with little change on the horizon. For practitioners dealing with cost issues,
and that should be all litigators at various points in their work, the horizon is now looking decidedly choppy. So what can we look forward to over the coming year?
A new sub-committee of the Civil Procedure Rules committee, chaired by Mr Justice Coulson will be reviewing the operation of the costs management rules. Lord Justice Jackson in his speech last night gave some insight into the issues which will be
Pre action costs management in cases where such costs are high
Amendment to CPR 3.15 and CPR PD 3E – making of a costs management orders
When costs budgets should be filed – his view is 14 days before the CMC subject to court discretion
A standard form of costs management order
Court powers to deal with costs incurred prior to the costs budget. Be warned this could include the ability to deal with them by summary assessment
Improvements to Precedent H
Whilst this was in the news last year it seemed to fade from view. The Hutton Committee however continue to work on the
introduction and at the ACL Conference last week set out a strong recommendation that firms should start to record time in line with the J codes. A voluntary introduction will take place in October this year with a mandatory pilot scheme coming
into force in April next year for any costs applications in the SCCO.
Look out for more on this here from Alexander Hutton QC later this month.
The new Part 36 rules introduction last month will continue to bed down and we will start to see the impact on costs from the application
of the new rules.
Will Guideline hourly rates have had their day? Stuck at rates from 2010 and with many decisions looking in detail
at hourly rates will the relevance of the GHR diminish as the courts look to other ways of determining whether costs sought should be ordered?
The new regulations are currently being drafted. In discussions at the ACL conference last week it became apparent that there is still a long way to go in terms of ironing out the concerns practitioners have with the existing regulations which have
been given a wide berth by many practitioners. Questions such as whether counsels fees should be included within the cap remain to be determined and the use of hybrid DBAs which was specifically ruled out by the Government last year is still being discussed – the question of will they or won’t they be introduced at some stage still hangs around.
Electronic bundling has been introduced in the Supreme Court and will come in elsewhere but there are currently no plans for use in the Civil Courts. Will this change? The costs savings of having electronic bundles can be enormous in
heavy document cases. HHJ Simon Brown QC is definitely of the view that solicitors should make more use of the technology which is readily available in the courts.
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
**excludes LexisPSL Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance. To discuss trialling these LexisPSL services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial. See our full terms here.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Janna is a dispute resolution lawyer. She deals primarily with cross border issues and is active in the work being undertaken in relation to the implications of Brexit for Dispute Resolution lawyers. Janna also heads up a LexisNexis costs team bringing together expertise from across the company to deal with the costs issues facing the profession.
0330 161 1234