Dispute Resolution analysis: The court refused to discharge freezing orders where the application was made late, relevant arguments had not been made at earlier interim hearings, and there had been no material change in circumstances. This case shows the importance of a party raising all points reasonably open to them at the first opportunity. In considering the application, the court analysed the Court of Appeal’s judgment in Chanel Limited v FW Woolworth & Co Ltd and the Commercial Court decision in Orb a.r.l v Ruhan. The court also considered the effect of coronavirus (COVID-19) and CPR PD 51ZA on a retrospective application to extend time. Written by Harriet Campbell, professional support lawyer, at Stephenson Harwood LLP.